2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2012.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal response of optimal granular damping devices

Abstract: Granular damping devices constitute an emerging technology for the attenuation of vibrations based on the dissipative nature of particle collisions. We show that the performance of such devices is independent of the material properties of the particles for working conditions where damping is optimal. Even the suppression of a dissipation mode (collisional or frictional) is unable to alter the response. We explain this phenomenon in terms of the inelastic collapse of granular materials. These findings provide a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of particular relevance to our current investigation is the work of Sánchez et al [31] which shows that, under the right conditions (namely a large particle number, N, and a high particle density, η), the resonant response of a granular damper is effectively independent of the material properties possessed by the individual particles of which it is formed. It is hypothesized that this universal response occurs due to the inelastic collapse [32,33] exhibited by a granular system under the aforementioned bed conditions, meaning that the bed will possess effectively zero elasticity, irrespective of the specific restitution (ε) and frictional (μ) coefficients of the particles involved (at least so long as μ > 0 and/or ε < 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Of particular relevance to our current investigation is the work of Sánchez et al [31] which shows that, under the right conditions (namely a large particle number, N, and a high particle density, η), the resonant response of a granular damper is effectively independent of the material properties possessed by the individual particles of which it is formed. It is hypothesized that this universal response occurs due to the inelastic collapse [32,33] exhibited by a granular system under the aforementioned bed conditions, meaning that the bed will possess effectively zero elasticity, irrespective of the specific restitution (ε) and frictional (μ) coefficients of the particles involved (at least so long as μ > 0 and/or ε < 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Discrete element models have been comprehensively applied to particle dampers and might represent a good alternative for modelling. 12,13,[26][27][28][29][30] The effectiveness of EPDs is greatly improved when the working frequency is tuned to a vibration mode of a plate and when the dampers are strategically located at points at which high displacement occurs. In particular, the three EPDs in this study, tuned to the vibration mode [2 0] of a steel plate, were applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When tiny particles were used (300 μm), different patterns appeared depending on the vibration frequency f, for instance, stable oscillons and surface waves similar to those observed in vibrated granular beds [15][16][17][18][19]. The above grain size dependence reveals, as in the case of granular dampers [20][21][22][23][24][25], the relevance of the main dissipation mechanism: interparticle collisions for large particles and friction as the particle size decreases.Experimental setup.-A transparent ping-pong ball (coefficient of restitution ϵ c ≈ 0.91 AE 0.02, mass m c ¼ 1.9 AE 0.1 g, and inner or outer diameter D c ¼ 3.75=3.80 AE 0.02 cm) was partially filled with liquid or grains and placed on a steel plate (mass ¼ 240 g) subjected to vertical oscillations SðtÞ ¼ A sinðωtÞ; here, A is the vibration amplitude and ω ¼ 2πf. To ensure that the ball was bouncing, we used a dimensionless acceleration Γ ¼ Aω 2 =g > 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%