“…Some other researchers (e.g. Knight, 2017;Koay, 2018;Şenel, Günaydın, Sarıtaş, & Çiğdem, 2019), on the other hand, used Akbulut et al's (2016) scale and reported checking posts, checking social networking profiles, sharing content on social networks, liking posts, commenting on shared photos, posting status updates on social networks, tagging friends on photos, chatting, watching shared videos, shopping online, visiting deal-of-the-day websites, visiting online shopping sites, visiting auction sites, using online banking services, visiting online shops for used products, checking job advertisements, downloading music, watching videos online, listening to music online, downloading videos, downloading applications, visiting betting/gambling sites, betting and gambling online, checking online sport sites, playing online games, commenting on trending topics, posting tweets, reading tweets, favouriting a tweet, and retweeting a tweet as types of cyberloafing behaviours students engage with during class hours. In addition to this, there are also studies (e.g., Akgün, 2020;Çok, 2018;Dursun et al, 2018;Sarıtepecı, 2019) that used the same scale and reported its sub-dimensions sharing, shopping, real-time updating, accessing online content, gambling as types of cyberloafing behaviours students carry out.…”