2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2014.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University course timetabling using hybridized artificial bee colony with hill climbing optimizer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…food sources) locally to the maximum limit. The concept of this hybridization is adapted from our previous works on the ABC to the university timetabling problem [26] in which of the employed bee operator is replaced by the HCO in its operation to enhance the search intensification. Note that the feasibility of the solution search space is taken into consideration during the search process.…”
Section: Hybridization Abc With Hill Climbing Optimizermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…food sources) locally to the maximum limit. The concept of this hybridization is adapted from our previous works on the ABC to the university timetabling problem [26] in which of the employed bee operator is replaced by the HCO in its operation to enhance the search intensification. Note that the feasibility of the solution search space is taken into consideration during the search process.…”
Section: Hybridization Abc With Hill Climbing Optimizermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Awadallah et al [31] proposed other population-based metaheuristic method for NRP using the same INRC2010 dataset. Furthermore, the value of the second parameter limit is fixed, where this value is adopted from [26].…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While smaller instances might be solved by exact algorithms, most real-world problems are large dimensional problems, so there is a need for heuristic methods to obtain near-optimal solutions in reasonable time. The most used ones are metaheuristics like tabu search (Valdes, Crespo and Tamarit, 2002;Yuan and Lan, 2016), simulated annealing (Abramson, 1991;Thompson and Dowsland, 1998;Bellio, Ceschia, Di Gaspero, Schaerf and Urli, 2016;Goh, Kendall and Sabar 2018), genetic and evolutionary algorithms (Beligiannis, Moschopoulosa, Kaperonisa and Likothanassisa, 2008;Susan and Bhutani, 2018;Matias, Fajardo and Medina, 2018), neural networks (Kovačič, 1993), ant colonies (Socha et al, 2003), bee colony algorithm (Bolaji, Kahader and Betar, 2014), particle swarm optimization (Chen and Shih, 2013;Imran Hossain, Akhand, Shuvo, Siddique and Adeli,, 2019), artificial immune algorithm (Yazdani, Naderi and Zeinali, 2017) and hyperheuristics (Burke, McCollum, Meisels, Petrovic, and Qu, 2007b). Besides, there are some studies dealing with the analysis and design of interactive decision support system for timetable management (Piechowiak and Kolski, 2004;Kamisli Ozturk, Ozturk and Sagir, 2010).…”
Section: Problem Complexity and The Need For A Heuristic Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third group of solution method is the population-based optimization methods that gain more attention by researchers in seeking new methods that are inspired by the nature phenomena such as genetic algorithm [7,8,12], evolutionary algorithm [3,17,18], ant colony algorithm [19], bee colony algorithm [20,21], firefly algorithm [22], and particle swam optimization [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%