2015
DOI: 10.5539/jedp.v5n1p97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University Environment and Global Citizenship Identification

Abstract: We examined the influence of the university environment (Study 1), and specific college courses (Study 2), on the antecedents and outcomes of global citizenship identification. In Study 1, participants' perception of the university environment as prescribing a global citizen identity predicted the perception of one's normative environment as prescribing this identity and global awareness (antecedents) leading to greater identification with global citizens. Global citizenship identification then predicted great… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Students in classes whose syllabi contained more global words (e.g., justice, cultural, environment) gained greater global awareness across the semester, which in turn predicted higher GCI, and led indirectly in model tests to higher scores on all six prosocial values. Blake, Pierce, Gibson, Reysen, and Katzarska‐Miller () replicated this effect using student ratings of the extent that the class covered global topics rather than the number of global terms in the syllabi.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Global Human Identification and Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Students in classes whose syllabi contained more global words (e.g., justice, cultural, environment) gained greater global awareness across the semester, which in turn predicted higher GCI, and led indirectly in model tests to higher scores on all six prosocial values. Blake, Pierce, Gibson, Reysen, and Katzarska‐Miller () replicated this effect using student ratings of the extent that the class covered global topics rather than the number of global terms in the syllabi.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Global Human Identification and Cmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Beyond the media, more proximate normative influences have been found to affect GCI and its related prosocial values, including the perception that one’s university encourages global citizenship identification (Blake et al, ), exposure to a professor who favorably (vs. negatively) discusses GHIC (Gibson & Reysen, ), and perceiving that other fans of a fan interest group value it (Plante, Roberts, Reysen, & Gerbasi, ). In short, the extent that one’s institutions, authority figures (e.g., professors), and others with similar interests in one’s normative environment value GHIC predicts one seeing oneself as a global citizen.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Global Human Identification and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M.E. Blake [3], Munardji, N. Kholis, N. Mufidah [13], V. Swaminathan [18] определили направленность образовательной среды на развитие личностных качеств, социализацию личности.…”
Section: обзор литературыunclassified
“…В работах исследователей (M.E. Blake [3], L. Hutchinson [7]) подчеркива-ется, что ключевым моментом выступает содействие формированию у личности иностранного студента понимания основных особенностей иноязычных культур -культуры страны изучаемого языка и культуры образовательной среды, в которой оказался иностранный студент. В рамках нашей исследовательской работы важным ориентиром становится сохранение сознательного отношения к специфике и уникальному колориту родной культуры иностранных студентов.…”
Section: обсуждение и выводыunclassified
“…Blake (2015), examined the perceptions of undergraduate students and tested the model of antecedents and outcomes of global citizenship identification (cited in Blake, 2015), where the term “antecedents” relates to one’s normative environment and to an individual’s global awareness. These qualities contribute to global citizenship identity, which according to the model, predict “prosocial outcomes such as intergroup empathy, valuing diversity, social justice, felt responsibility to act for betterment of the world and intergroup helping” (Blake et al, 2015, p. 98).…”
Section: Purpose and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%