2015
DOI: 10.1504/ijisd.2015.071853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University food gardens: a unifying place for higher education sustainability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several case studies have examined the impacts of campus gardens on student engagement, experiential learning, and campus sustainability, there is scant research on the extent to which gardens are incorporated into educational programming in the U.S. HEIs in general. One example is Duram and Klein (2015), which surveyed 52 campus gardens in the United States and found that 92% of garden manager respondents cited “education” as the primary goal of the garden and indicated that course experiences were primarily in the areas of sustainability and environmental studies. To our knowledge, there is no information about incorporation of campus gardens into biology‐related programs.…”
Section: Urban Agriculture In the Curriculum—current Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several case studies have examined the impacts of campus gardens on student engagement, experiential learning, and campus sustainability, there is scant research on the extent to which gardens are incorporated into educational programming in the U.S. HEIs in general. One example is Duram and Klein (2015), which surveyed 52 campus gardens in the United States and found that 92% of garden manager respondents cited “education” as the primary goal of the garden and indicated that course experiences were primarily in the areas of sustainability and environmental studies. To our knowledge, there is no information about incorporation of campus gardens into biology‐related programs.…”
Section: Urban Agriculture In the Curriculum—current Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they also suggest retrofitting campuses in line with biophilic design principles to support ecological and socio-spatial connectivity. Duram and Kleine [ 53 ] argue similarly, they found that CCGs can increase knowledge of sustainability, as well as institutional sustainability through a range of measures. Campus gardens play a role in Colding and Barthel’s [ 51 ] connectivity agenda: stakeholder stewardship and the public prominence of the CCG are considered beneficial for developing a stronger sense of place as well as pro-environmental behaviors.…”
Section: The Role and Function Of Campus Community Gardensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is little academic literature that evaluates the success or failure of CCGs, Duram and Williams [ 2 ] suggest key elements for a successful CCG, including: Long term funding, productive gardens, trained workforce, a visible presence, hands-on learning, and links with broader sustainability networks. To this list, we add strong student participation and institutional support [ 53 ]. Stephens et al [ 51 ] found a clear organizational structure, close ties to the university curriculum and management, a strategic plan and innovative fundraising events were instrumental in CCG success.…”
Section: The Role and Function Of Campus Community Gardensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other cases, they are carefully designed and purposely managed by the institution (Cheang et al , 2017). But overall, higher education is interfacing with agriculture beyond traditional agriculture degrees, which may be contributing to train students on food, sustainability and critical thinking, among others (Barlett, 2011; Duram and Klein, 2015; LaCharite, 2016). Besides, GBL has been proved to constitute a suitable strategy in the frame of the current educational model for European Higher Education, which is based on teaching and learning by competences (Klieme et al , 2008), because it is capable of mobilizing the cognitive, procedural, attitudinal and relational dimensions of learning (Eugenio-Gozalbo et al , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%