University Leaders and the Public Agenda: Talking About Women and Diversity in STEM Fields

Abstract

We undertake an investigation of public statements and pronouncements from leaders at various universities to gain insight into institutional values and environments relative to women and their participation and advancement in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and other disciplinary fields. Employing content analysis techniques to focus on terminological use and keyword interdependencies in these speeches, our findings indicate that, while gender equality is addressed as a separate topic in its own right, university leaders raise issues of gender in the context of STEM participation primarily in conjunction only with other topics. As expected, the data also support arguments suggesting diversity in general as an important goal espoused in the rhetoric of university representatives. Questions remain, however, concerning whether these speeches presage concrete institutional commitments and responses relative to the achievement of diversity, gender equality, and gender equity in the STEM professoriate. Copyright 2009 by The Policy Studies Organization.

Recasting Title IX: Addressing Gender Equity in the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Professoriate

“…This state of affairs brings us to a point where a focus on the U.S. policy environment reveals growing attention to issues of STEM women in the academic workforce. Indeed, this topic has engendered a variety of debates and holds a place of growing prominence (and controversy) on the public agenda, with leading government officials and academic and other stakeholders calling for regulatory action and programmatic responses aimed at addressing gender inequities and effecting institutional transformation (Hopewell, McNeely, Kuiler, & Hahm, 2009; Monosson, 2008; Sevo, 2008). At center stage in this situation is Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, the leading legislative tool for remedying gender inequity in higher education (see APA, 2009).…”

Board Gender Diversity and Corporate Expropriations: Evidence from Pakistan Stock Exchange

“…While managing business expropriation the director's job is treated as a significant component. According to Hopewell (2009), one of the problems that lead to the breakdown of Lehman Brothers (2008) is the issue of directors of the firm. He uncovered a few shortcomings that need consideration, for example, the directors' performance and the disappointment of the structure of the board as far as directors' abilities, exposure, and experience.…”

Where We Stand: A Review on Equity in Public Administration and Policy

“…PAQ Vol 47 Issue 4 2009; Bolitzer & Godtland, 2012;Lewis et al, 2017), environmental justice (Liang, 2016a) and education (Hopewell et al, 2009) studies. Research on equity in the policy sphere has primarily focused on achieving equitable outcomes (Eckerd, 2013;Dobbin & Lubell, 2019).…”