2005
DOI: 10.1080/09654310500107175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University spin-off policies and economic development in Less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
111
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 181 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
111
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also more likely to be organisationally and institutionally 'thin', with a lack of innovationdriven public or private sector entities, often with a high dependence on SMEs exhibiting low growth trajectories and operating within only fragmented connections to external sources of knowledge (Sánchez, 1992;Vaessen and Keeble, 1995;Huggins, 1997;North and Smallbone, 2000;Benneworth and Charles, 2005;Tödtling and Trippl, 2005;Lagendijk and Lorentzen, 2007;Virkkala, 2007;Malecki, 2007;Doloreux and Dionne, 2008).…”
Section: Regional Competitiveness Knowledge and Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They are also more likely to be organisationally and institutionally 'thin', with a lack of innovationdriven public or private sector entities, often with a high dependence on SMEs exhibiting low growth trajectories and operating within only fragmented connections to external sources of knowledge (Sánchez, 1992;Vaessen and Keeble, 1995;Huggins, 1997;North and Smallbone, 2000;Benneworth and Charles, 2005;Tödtling and Trippl, 2005;Lagendijk and Lorentzen, 2007;Virkkala, 2007;Malecki, 2007;Doloreux and Dionne, 2008).…”
Section: Regional Competitiveness Knowledge and Universitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite restrictions and limitations, it is generally acknowledged that universities can serve as sources of knowledge for industry, and that policy initiatives designed to build new niches of knowledge and develop more effective mechanisms for transferring university-based knowledge to regional partners can potentially bolster regional innovation and economic development (Benneworth and Charles, 2005).…”
Section: Policy Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, changes in levels of entrepreneurship and contributions to regional economic development will take time to emerge, and as such, any effects are only likely to be seen in the long term (Huggins and Johnston, 2009;Huggins and Williams, 2009). Alternatively, regions can be uncompetitive and lack entrepreneurial dynamism because they lack key strengths which make leading regions prosper (Benneworth and Charles, 2005;Chaston, 2009;Huggins, 1997;Huggins and Johnston, 2009;Huggins and Williams, 2011;Lagendijk and Lorentzen, 2007;North and Smallbone, 2000;Virkkala, 2007).…”
Section: Research In Applied Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem is the natural propensity for knowledge capital to generate a cumulative effect, with a virtuous cycle adding self-reinforcing advantages for core regions and a viscious cycle discouraging innovations in peripheries. Benneworth and Charles (2005) analyse the specific concept of university spin-off companies precisely as one of those facilitators of interaction between firms and the environment, and as tools for regional development. In exploring the economic benefits that such companies can bring, the authors favour knowledge accumulation and the 'building up' of 'territorial knowledge pools'.…”
Section: Is Technological Change Driving the Modern Rural World?mentioning
confidence: 99%