2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10805-014-9219-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University Students’ Perceptions of Academic Cheating: Triangulating Quantitative and Qualitative Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings regarding gender were consistent with common findings in the literature on gender and self‐reported AD (e.g. Sideridis, et al , ; Wei, Chesnut, et al , ), with females reporting lower pervasiveness of dishonest behaviors and considering these behaviors as less legitimate than males. Novel to the present study was the finding regarding gender and the EDI, with females experiencing a larger EDI compared to males.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings regarding gender were consistent with common findings in the literature on gender and self‐reported AD (e.g. Sideridis, et al , ; Wei, Chesnut, et al , ), with females reporting lower pervasiveness of dishonest behaviors and considering these behaviors as less legitimate than males. Novel to the present study was the finding regarding gender and the EDI, with females experiencing a larger EDI compared to males.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…While these findings are not conclusive (e.g. Wei, Chesnut, Barnard‐Brak, & Schmidt, ), they do indicate that gender plays a role in the pervasiveness and perception of self‐reported AD. The literature attributes gender differences in dishonesty to cultural reasons (Sideridis et al , ), distinct socialization processes (Whitley, Nelson, & Jones, ), differentiated learning goals or the method of self‐report (Newstead, Franklyn‐Stokes, & Armstead, ).…”
Section: Individual Differences and The Edimentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is thought that as the grade increases, the students become more aware of the sanctions for cheating behavior, problems of adaptation to the school and its environment highly solved, they become more sensitive about the ethical rules of their potential professions and, the risk is more difficult to take (Akdağ & Güneş, 2002). In a different study, it was implied that there was no significant difference between the attitudes of cheating in the exam according to gender and grade variables (Wei et al, 2014). In another study, it was stated that there was a meaningful relationship between grade and exam cheating behaviors.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cheating (crib sheets, copying off) Plagiarism 'Outsourcing' of homework Ghostwriting of term papers/theses Services, gifts, informal agreements, or payments in exchange for grades or preferential treatment Bowers (1964), Sivak (2006), Latova and Latov (2007), Callahan (2010), Denisova-Schmidt (2013), Wei et al (2014), Denisova-Schmidt (2015) Academic integrity (faculty)…”
Section: University Admissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%