2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2007.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unloaded Movement Facilitation Exercise Compared to No Exercise or Alternative Therapy on Outcomes for People with Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(79 reference statements)
0
44
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…36,37 However, neither nonsurgical nor surgical therapy restore functional native disk tissue, or regenerate the degenerated disk tissue, resulting in chronic inflammatory pain. Therefore, attempts are being made to seek effective biological alternatives so that the damaged tissue can be recovered both in structure and functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36,37 However, neither nonsurgical nor surgical therapy restore functional native disk tissue, or regenerate the degenerated disk tissue, resulting in chronic inflammatory pain. Therefore, attempts are being made to seek effective biological alternatives so that the damaged tissue can be recovered both in structure and functionality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of systematic reviews, which relate to MDT for low back pain, attest to its evidence base. There is evidence supporting the efficacy of MDT in acute to chronic low back pain [2][3][4][5][6][7] ; the prognostic validity of a key feature of the system, which is centralization 8 ; and the greater reliability of the MDT assessment process compared to other methods. 9 The application of the system to extremity as opposed to spinal musculoskeletal symptoms was published more recently.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Twenty-one articles 1,6,8,9,[12][13][14][15][20][21][22]24,25,28,33,[38][39][40][42][43][44] were selected for further evaluation. Thirteen reviews 1,6,9,13,15,[20][21][22]38,39,[42][43][44] were eliminated after further evaluation. Reasons for exclusion included assessed outcomes that were not disability or pain in 1 review, 20 interventions that were not focused on specific stabilization exercises in 8 reviews, 9,15,21,38,39,[42][43][44] and the lack of an SR format in 1 review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirteen reviews 1,6,9,13,15,[20][21][22]38,39,[42][43][44] were eliminated after further evaluation. Reasons for exclusion included assessed outcomes that were not disability or pain in 1 review, 20 interventions that were not focused on specific stabilization exercises in 8 reviews, 9,15,21,38,39,[42][43][44] and the lack of an SR format in 1 review. 22 Additionally, 2 reviews were practice guidelines, 1,6 and 1 13 was a duplication of findings published in another review.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%