2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unmasking decoupling: Redefining the Resource Intensity of the Economy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some advances regarding two of the countries of our study; in the case of Sweden, GS estimations are available since 1850 and in the case of Chile since 1900 [134,135]. The incorporation into the analysis of resource intensity measures could also improve our understanding due to fact decoupling: the capacity of the digital economy to reduce the use of materials is going to have an impact on countries depending on natural resources [136]. In this context, further research should focus on the reconstruction of green national accounts for the rest of the countries studied in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some advances regarding two of the countries of our study; in the case of Sweden, GS estimations are available since 1850 and in the case of Chile since 1900 [134,135]. The incorporation into the analysis of resource intensity measures could also improve our understanding due to fact decoupling: the capacity of the digital economy to reduce the use of materials is going to have an impact on countries depending on natural resources [136]. In this context, further research should focus on the reconstruction of green national accounts for the rest of the countries studied in this paper.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elasticity of fossil RMC is higher than that of biomass RCM in both EORA-and WIOD-based models. Economic growth, affluence or final demand are recognized as key determinants of material use (e.g., Bithas & Kalimeris, 2017;Eisenmenger et al, 2016;Hatfield-Dodds et al, 2017;Krausmann et al, 2009;Pothen, 2017;Schaffartzik, Wiedenhofer, & Eisenmenger, 2015;Schandl & Turner, 2009;Shao, Schaffartzik, Mayer, & Krausmann, 2017;Wood, Lenzen, & Foran, 2009). Long-term material flow accounting studies have shown decreasing coupling intensities between GDP and direct material use as the economic development of countries proceeds.…”
Section: Driving Forces Of Fossil and Biomass Rmcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bithas and Kalimeris [14] World The elasticity of GDP and income to DMC MFA, Tapio decoupling index 1900Tapio decoupling index -2009 From 1900 to 2009, there was no global decoupling. After the 1970s, industrialized economies experienced decoupling, but were offset by resource intensification in some developing economies.…”
Section: -2011mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are differences between the results of the dematerialization assessment at the global level and the country level. The dematerialization trend of developed countries or economies may be offset by the resource intensification of developing countries or economies [14]. Hence, at the global level, it is difficult to determine whether dematerialization has occurred in country level or economies [13][14][15]17].…”
Section: Dai and Liu [21] Beijingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation