Convivialities 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315145709-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpacking Intercultural Conviviality in Multiethnic Commercial Streets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Gilroy launched the concept of conviviality, we follow the model of intercultural conviviality developed by Martha Radice (2016), who studied conviviality in multi-ethnic streets through four constituent layers to grasp both the practical and discursive modes of emplaced social activities and exchanges. These four components include microplaces, codes of sociability, perceived intergroup relations and place image.…”
Section: Intercultural Conviviality and Cultural Commoning As Analyti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Gilroy launched the concept of conviviality, we follow the model of intercultural conviviality developed by Martha Radice (2016), who studied conviviality in multi-ethnic streets through four constituent layers to grasp both the practical and discursive modes of emplaced social activities and exchanges. These four components include microplaces, codes of sociability, perceived intergroup relations and place image.…”
Section: Intercultural Conviviality and Cultural Commoning As Analyti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Dutch residents without migration backgrounds living in dense four-story buildings have been found to feel less threatened by ethnic diversity than people living in suburbs characterized by larger housing blocks (Crul, Steinmetz, and Lelie 2020). Research has also pointed out that street furniture in public spaces such as benches or bus shelters can facilitate positive group interactions (Radice 2016).…”
Section: Urban Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The micro-setting, that is, the level of everyday life encounters such as in restaurants, cafes, or public transport stations, is rarely studied. A rich social sciences tradition shows that contextual diversity in spaces, such as associations (Van der Meer 2016), schools (Janmaat 2015), leisure (Schaeffer 2013), consumption (Radice 2016), the workplace (Kokkonen, Esaiasson, and Gilljam 2015), or social organizations (Achbari 2015), provides important meeting opportunities for people of different backgrounds. Based on the contact theory framework, research has argued that regular exposure enhances knowledge about the outgroup, reduces anxiety about intergroup contact, increases empathy, and facilitates general trust (e.g., Hewstone 2003; Stephan and Stephan 2000; Pettigrew and Tropp 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, these authors emphasize the conviviality that proximity along with the interactions and convergence in cultures that it sometimes results in. Such conviviality, it is argued, can obviate hostility toward proximate migrants (Radice 2016;Crush, Ramachandran, & Pendleton 2013:47). Finally, the greater legibility of migrants that proximity permits is cast in a positive light as obviating the uncertainty over others and what they represent that geographical distance often breeds.…”
Section: Targeting During Epidemic-era Xenophobic Outburstsmentioning
confidence: 99%