2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2934178
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpaired Image Denoising Using a Generative Adversarial Network in X-Ray CT

Abstract: This paper proposes a deep learning-based denoising method for noisy low-dose computerized tomography (CT) images in the absence of paired training data. The proposed method uses a fidelity-embedded generative adversarial network (GAN) to learn a denoising function from unpaired training data of low-dose CT (LDCT) and standard-dose CT (SDCT) images, where the denoising function is the optimal generator in the GAN framework. This paper analyzes the f-GAN objective to derive a suitable generator that is optimize… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed method was compared with the PWLS method with total variation regularization (PWLS-TV) [23], nonlocal mean (PWLS-NLM) [10], IM-DL [19], and IM-DL with the cycle consistency loss (IM-Cycle) [9]. The model of PWLS-TV and PWLS-NLM is given by arg min…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed method was compared with the PWLS method with total variation regularization (PWLS-TV) [23], nonlocal mean (PWLS-NLM) [10], IM-DL [19], and IM-DL with the cycle consistency loss (IM-Cycle) [9]. The model of PWLS-TV and PWLS-NLM is given by arg min…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the difference between IM-Cycle and IM-DL is that it use the cycle-consistency loss (the last two terms in (22)). As suggested in [9], [19], the parameters in IM-DL and IM-Cycle were set to α = 10 (α, γ) = (10, 5), respectively. Fig.3 shows the graph of the objective function of (7) over the number of outer iterations for AAPM datasets.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations