2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep06(2021)115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unpolarized quark and gluon TMD PDFs and FFs at N3LO

Abstract: In this paper we calculate analytically the perturbative matching coefficients for unpolarized quark and gluon Transverse-Momentum-Dependent (TMD) Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) and Fragmentation Functions (FFs) through Next-to-Next-to-Next-to-Leading Order (N3LO) in QCD. The N3LO TMD PDFs are calculated by solving a system of differential equation of Feynman and phase space integrals. The TMD FFs are obtained by analytic continuation from space-like quantities to time-like quantities, taking into accoun… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the N 3 LO hard functions for DY and for Higgs production in the m top → ∞ limit have been known for some time [75][76][77], reaching N 3 LL accuracy for these processes JHEP09(2021)108 requires, as also done in [12,34], to supplement the ingredients deduced in [78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92] with the quark and gluon transverse-momentum dependent (TMD) beam functions at N 3 LO, which were recently obtained via two independent calculations in refs. [93][94][95]. Our predictions are further improved by the inclusion of transverse-recoil effects, which we achieve by implementing in RadISH the prescription of ref.…”
Section: Jhep09(2021)108mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the N 3 LO hard functions for DY and for Higgs production in the m top → ∞ limit have been known for some time [75][76][77], reaching N 3 LL accuracy for these processes JHEP09(2021)108 requires, as also done in [12,34], to supplement the ingredients deduced in [78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92] with the quark and gluon transverse-momentum dependent (TMD) beam functions at N 3 LO, which were recently obtained via two independent calculations in refs. [93][94][95]. Our predictions are further improved by the inclusion of transverse-recoil effects, which we achieve by implementing in RadISH the prescription of ref.…”
Section: Jhep09(2021)108mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The collinear coefficient functions C (3) are extracted from the transverse-momentumdependent (TMD) parton-density functions (PDFs). These, in turn, are obtained combining the TMD beam functions and the soft function, computed at third order in [93][94][95] and [83,84], respectively. The G (2) function can be instead extracted from the computation of the linearly-polarised gluon TMD PDFs at two loops [88,107].…”
Section: Extraction Of Hard and Collinear Coefficient Functions Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[91,92,[110][111][112] have accomplished N 3 LL very recently. Thanks to the developments in fixed-order perturbative calculations, the cusp anomalous dimension has achieved fourloop accuracy [113] and the fixed-order ingredients (including the non-singlet quark form factor [114], soft [102,115] and beam functions [116][117][118]) at N 3 LO are available now. The non-cusp anomalous dimensions can be extracted from the latter sectors.…”
Section: Jhep10(2021)088mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: while this article was under completion, an independent calculation was made available on the arXiv in ref. [137] based on the method proposed in ref. [80].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of ref. [137] provided an important cross check on intermediary results for genuine two loop contributions in the K gq channel that allowed us to track an error in a routine related to the analytic continuation of the partonic coefficient functions. The initial discrepancy was a non-logarithmically enhanced finite and rational term proportional to (C A − C F )ζ 2 ζ 3 in the K gq and K qg channel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%