2019
DOI: 10.1101/543603
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling Diagnostic Biomarkers of Schizophrenia Through Structure-Revealing Fusion of Multi-Modal Neuroimaging Data

Abstract: Fusing complementary information from different modalities can lead to the discovery of more accurate diagnostic biomarkers for psychiatric disorders. However, biomarker discovery through data fusion is challenging since it requires extracting interpretable and reproducible patterns from data sets, consisting of shared/unshared patterns and of different orders. For example, multi-channel electroencephalography (EEG) signals from multiple subjects can be represented as a third-order tensor with modes: subject, … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the model is applied on field data instead of a randomly‐distributed experimental dataset, the μ f and σ f are influenced by several distinct factors or parameters. For example, fluorescence quantum yield and ionization efficiency have been identified as potential factors controlling the sharedness of model‐derived components between EEM and FT‐ICR‐MS datasets (Wünsch et al 2018), while centering across the subject mode could have significant effects on these terms of a model integrating multiple instrument datasets (Acar et al 2019). Thus, the μ f and σ f in this case could be regarded as weights or contribution of one component to the total variances to EEM and FT‐IR spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the model is applied on field data instead of a randomly‐distributed experimental dataset, the μ f and σ f are influenced by several distinct factors or parameters. For example, fluorescence quantum yield and ionization efficiency have been identified as potential factors controlling the sharedness of model‐derived components between EEM and FT‐ICR‐MS datasets (Wünsch et al 2018), while centering across the subject mode could have significant effects on these terms of a model integrating multiple instrument datasets (Acar et al 2019). Thus, the μ f and σ f in this case could be regarded as weights or contribution of one component to the total variances to EEM and FT‐IR spectra.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers may be utilized to enhance the accuracy of diagnosis, monitoring of therapy, and prediction of treatment outcomes in individuals with SCZ (Perkovic et al, 2017). Neuroimaging holds great promise as a tool for developing biomarkers of SCZ, as it enables the capture of phenotypic variations in molecular and cellular disease targets, as well as brain circuits (Acar et al, 2019;Kraguljac et al, 2021). Numerous neuroimaging studies have aimed to elucidate the neurobiological underpinnings of SCZ and differentiate neuroimaging characteristics between individuals with SCZ and healthy controls (HCs), as well as predict early treatment response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schizophrenia is a mental fragmentation disorder[55] that is predominantly characterized by distorted perception of reality, hallucinations or delusions, and thought disorganization[16]. Diagnosis relies on the use of subjective processes of elimination due to the lack of well-established, non-invasive diagnoses clinical biomarkers[46], although there has been extensive interest in the medical community for its’ development[29][30] aimed at aiding diagnostic, prognostic and theranostic research[5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%