2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101183
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling pore evolution in post-processing of binder jetting materials: X-ray computed tomography, computer vision, and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 11d compares the pore orientation distribution in the sintered body, the sintered feedstock, and the sintered body at high resolution. Each pore orientation is defined as the direction along the ellipsoid's longest axis [41]. The 3D orientation is represented by the angle of altitude (the angle of the orientation vector relative to the vertical axis or direction of the printing).…”
Section: Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 11d compares the pore orientation distribution in the sintered body, the sintered feedstock, and the sintered body at high resolution. Each pore orientation is defined as the direction along the ellipsoid's longest axis [41]. The 3D orientation is represented by the angle of altitude (the angle of the orientation vector relative to the vertical axis or direction of the printing).…”
Section: Sinteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enikeev et al suggest a step by step algorithm for processing chemical corrosion data that combines image processing, image binarization, and identification of object contours and analysis of object characterization. Their algorithm is based on fractal analysis for corrosion of cracking specimens, giving thus, a more complete analysis and representation of the failure the metallic surface is subjected to [16][17].…”
Section: Computer Vision Techniques Used In Metal Failure Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Ibragimova et al [24] employed an ensemble of ANNs to predict the non-monotonic behavior and texture evolution of face-centered cubic (FCC) polycrystalline materials. Machine learning approaches such as feed forward neural network (FFNN), convolutional neural network (CNN), deep belief network (DBN), k-means clustering, support vector machine (SVM), and random forest (RF) have been applied in additive manufacturing to design new materials [25][26][27], to optimize topology [28,29], to predict porosity [30][31][32], to monitor printing process for quality assurance [33][34][35], to predict thermal history during printing [36,37], to construct process maps [38,39], to predict melt pool dimensions [40], to classify melting states [41], and to detect process-induced defects [42][43][44]. Recently, Muhammad et al [45] proposed a machine learning framework to model the evolution of local strains, plastic anisotropy, and fracture in AlSi10Mg alloy produced by SLM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%