2020
DOI: 10.1002/eem2.12152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling Shuttle Effect and Suppression Strategy in Lithium/Sulfur Cells by In Situ/Operando X‐ray Absorption Spectroscopic Characterization

Abstract: By employing in situ/operando X‐ray absorption characterization, the veritable shuttle effect and its suppression/conversion strategy using bismuth‐based nanomaterials as electrocatalytic layer in lithium/sulfur cells are unraveled.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 37,40–45 ] With the aid of some unique in‐situ/operando technics, the behaviors of adsorbed polysulfides on the electrode/electrolyte are well investigated and interpreted. [ 46 ] However, to achieve wide practical commercialization, high mass loading cathodes are necessary for high‐energy density, which will result in exponential increase and aggregation of polysulfides. [ 45,47,48 ] Given the limited trapping sites (pore volume and doping sites) will be saturated, the common adsorption strategies possibly still face failure in the long‐term operation and the batteries would remain worrisome shuttling phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 37,40–45 ] With the aid of some unique in‐situ/operando technics, the behaviors of adsorbed polysulfides on the electrode/electrolyte are well investigated and interpreted. [ 46 ] However, to achieve wide practical commercialization, high mass loading cathodes are necessary for high‐energy density, which will result in exponential increase and aggregation of polysulfides. [ 45,47,48 ] Given the limited trapping sites (pore volume and doping sites) will be saturated, the common adsorption strategies possibly still face failure in the long‐term operation and the batteries would remain worrisome shuttling phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 6 ] More interestingly, the sulfur is abundantly available on earth's crust and more environmental friendly than metal‐based intercalated cathodes, making it more competitive and costless for future application [6c,7] . In spite of the overwhelming capacity superiority, the device application of Li–S batteries is still hindered by the insulation of sulfur/Li 2 S, large volume change of ≈80% between S and Li 2 S (80%), shuttle effect of the soluble lithium polysulfides (LiPSs), sluggish conversion kinetics ( Figure A), [ 8 ] and the lithium dendrites growth on the anode surface (Figure 1B), resulting in depressed cycling lifespan with insufficient sulfur utilization and safety concerns. [ 9 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid evolution of smart grids, electronic vehicles, and smart devices, higher capacity and energy density storage systems are urgently needed 1–6 . As one of the most prospective candidates, lithium‐sulfur (Li‐S) batteries have been intensively studied, owing to their structural similarity to Li‐ion batteries but high energy density (2600 Wh kg −1 ), and low environmental impact of sulfur 7–12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the rapid evolution of smart grids, electronic vehicles, and smart devices, higher capacity and energy density storage systems are urgently needed. [1][2][3][4][5][6] As one of the most prospective candidates, lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries have been intensively studied, owing to their structural similarity to Li-ion batteries but high energy density (2600 Wh kg À1 ), and low environmental impact of sulfur. [7][8][9][10][11][12] However, the practical application of a Li-S battery with high-energy density will only be realized at the conditions of low negative/positive (N/P) and electrolyte/sulfur (E/S) ratios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%