2022
DOI: 10.5194/hess-26-2147-2022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the contribution of potential evaporation formulation to uncertainty under climate change

Abstract: Abstract. The increasing air temperature in a changing climate will impact actual evaporation and have consequences for water resource management in energy-limited regions. In many hydrological models, evaporation is assessed using a preliminary computation of potential evaporation (PE), which represents the evaporative demand of the atmosphere. Therefore, in impact studies, the quantification of uncertainties related to PE estimation, which can arise from different sources, is crucial. Indeed, a myriad of PE … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most parsimonious use just one (eg Thornthwaite, 1948;Oudin et al, 2005) or two (eg Blaney and Criddle, 1950;Priestley and Taylor, 1972) meteorological variables, but rely on empirical factors which are calibrated to historical or present-day climate. Different formulations of PE can show different trends under changing climate, adding to the uncertainty of climate change impacts on hydrology (Lemaitre-Basset et al, 2022). The more complex Penman-Monteith formulation (Monteith, 1965), while requiring a larger number of observed inputs, is derived from fundamental physics, so is able to represent temporal changes in drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most parsimonious use just one (eg Thornthwaite, 1948;Oudin et al, 2005) or two (eg Blaney and Criddle, 1950;Priestley and Taylor, 1972) meteorological variables, but rely on empirical factors which are calibrated to historical or present-day climate. Different formulations of PE can show different trends under changing climate, adding to the uncertainty of climate change impacts on hydrology (Lemaitre-Basset et al, 2022). The more complex Penman-Monteith formulation (Monteith, 1965), while requiring a larger number of observed inputs, is derived from fundamental physics, so is able to represent temporal changes in drivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, climate projection data were provided by six GCMs coupled with nine regional circulation models (RCMs) in order to spatially disaggregate data from GCMs. Due to the computation time limitations in generating the climate projections (CPs), not all GCM-RCM couples are available for every RCP (Table 1, Lemaitre-Basset et al, 2022). In our study, we considered 12 CPs (Soubeyroux et al, 2021) from the Euro-Cordex project (Jacob et al, 2014) selected by Météo-France to ensure the representativeness of future conditions in France.…”
Section: Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods of ET o rate determination are recommended. Most important are Blaney Criddle, Penman Montieth method, and Pan Evaporation method [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%