2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the influence of substrate on the growth rate, morphology and covalent structure of surface adherent polydopamine films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KPFM imaging further supported that PDA−Au1h slides contained less aggregated AuNPs (Figure 4a, b), while a layer of AuNPs covered the PDA−Au24h surface with a larger particle diameter (Figure 4c, d). Note, that the nature of the substrate (Si vs. quartz) may influence the outer PDA structure to some extent, which could affect somewhat the AuNP size on its surface [72] . Although in our case the surface coverage is slightly different between the silicon and quartz substrate samples, probably due to moderate variance in the substrate surface polarity, the overall morphology is similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…KPFM imaging further supported that PDA−Au1h slides contained less aggregated AuNPs (Figure 4a, b), while a layer of AuNPs covered the PDA−Au24h surface with a larger particle diameter (Figure 4c, d). Note, that the nature of the substrate (Si vs. quartz) may influence the outer PDA structure to some extent, which could affect somewhat the AuNP size on its surface [72] . Although in our case the surface coverage is slightly different between the silicon and quartz substrate samples, probably due to moderate variance in the substrate surface polarity, the overall morphology is similar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Note, that the nature of the substrate (Si vs. quartz) may influence the outer PDA structure to some extent, which could affect somewhat the AuNP size on its surface. [72] Although in our case the surface coverage is slightly different between the silicon and quartz substrate samples, probably due to moderate variance in the substrate surface polarity, the overall morphology is similar. According to the contact potential differences (CPD), which is proportional to the differences in the localized sample and probe work functions, the substrate and the observed particles are dissimilar in their chemical nature.…”
Section: Preparation and Characterization Of Pda-au Composites With D...mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…[ 56,67 ] It is, however, apparent that the adhesive strength of poly(dopamine) depends strongly on the type of substrate employed, making it hard to draw general conclusions on the stability of poly(dopamine) layers. [ 51,67,68 ] In this work, the stability against DMSO of the poly(dopamine) layer is highest when this was deposited at pH 7 in the presence of NaIO 4 , and—as shown by a control experiment with twice the amount of NaIO 4 (20 m m )—not affected by the concentration of NaIO 4 , similar to the observation made earlier on the deposition kinetics. Preliminary stability tests were performed on the produced surfaces, which turned out to be remarkably stable upon 24 h exposure to aqueous solutions in the pH range from 1 to 9 (see Figure S16, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[43,[45][46][47][48][49] To add to the complexity, it has been demonstrated that the chemical structure and morphological features of a poly(dopamine) film are influenced by both the type of substrate and the deposition conditions. [49][50][51][52][53] These properties can be expected to strongly influence the reactivity of the poly(dopamine) toward any subsequent modification steps. Evidently, insight in these factors is of great value for any procedure that involves modification of poly(dopamine) films.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[131] Copyright 2021, Elsevier. Substrate dependency [ 131] *45-50 nm in a single deposition step after about 16 h [9] *Possibility of multistep deposition. [ 46,47] E between 3 and 12 GPa, in the dry state, [ 27,[89][90][91] 𝜃 water almost substrate independent [9] *UV-vis spectra, [ 46,74] * 1 H and 13 C NMR [ 26,28] *FTIR of PDA-O 2 on Ge [ 134] *FTIR on different substrates [ 131] *EPR spectra [51] *Impermeability to Fe(CN) 6 4− anions [46] *Reduction of Ag + and Au 3+ [9] Isoelectric point:…”
Section: Surface Dependency On the Morphology And Covalent Structure ...mentioning
confidence: 99%