2016
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the Mechanism of Nanoscale Mechanical Reinforcement in Glassy Polymer Nanocomposites

Abstract: The mechanical reinforcement of polymer nanocomposites (PNCs) above the glass transition temperature, Tg, has been extensively studied. However, not much is known about the origin of this effect below Tg. In this Letter, we unravel the mechanism of PNC reinforcement within the glassy state by directly probing nanoscale mechanical properties with atomic force microscopy and macroscopic properties with Brillouin light scattering. Our results unambiguously show that the "glassy" Young's modulus in the interfacial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

15
178
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
15
178
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that typical solution-processed graphene flakes are much larger4 than the largest flakes studied here, we expect a sustained improvement in the composite stiffness with increasing flake size, a typical flake size for optimal reinforcement being in the 1–10 μm range36. It is also worth noting that a very recent experimental study of poly(vinyl acetate)/silica in the glassy phase has provided direct confirmation of an interfacial layer at the filler–matrix interface that consists of stretched polymer chains with an intrinsically higher interfacial elastic modulus than the matrix37. That work also demonstrates that the experimentally observed composite stiffness enhancement is best captured by a continuum model that accounts explicitly for the mechanical properties of the interfacial region (i.e., a three-phase model consisting of filler, interface, and matrix) rather than conventional two-phase composite models, which adds further credence to our observation in this work that the details of the filler–matrix interface are important beyond considerations of load transfer alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Given that typical solution-processed graphene flakes are much larger4 than the largest flakes studied here, we expect a sustained improvement in the composite stiffness with increasing flake size, a typical flake size for optimal reinforcement being in the 1–10 μm range36. It is also worth noting that a very recent experimental study of poly(vinyl acetate)/silica in the glassy phase has provided direct confirmation of an interfacial layer at the filler–matrix interface that consists of stretched polymer chains with an intrinsically higher interfacial elastic modulus than the matrix37. That work also demonstrates that the experimentally observed composite stiffness enhancement is best captured by a continuum model that accounts explicitly for the mechanical properties of the interfacial region (i.e., a three-phase model consisting of filler, interface, and matrix) rather than conventional two-phase composite models, which adds further credence to our observation in this work that the details of the filler–matrix interface are important beyond considerations of load transfer alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…The mechanism of mechanical reinforcement due to filler/polymer interface has been a controversial topic in composite research . For example, some researchers claimed that filler network plays a dominating role in mechanical reinforcement .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Confinement in polymer nanocomposites occurs when 1) polymer chains are constrained between layered silicates, 2) polymer chains are inside nanopores or nanocylinders, or 3) inorganic nanoparticles and hybrids (i.e., silica, alumina, POSS, and so on) dispersed in a polymer matrix where polymer fractions would have reduced mobility due to being tightly bound to the nanoparticles or in highly confined regions between closely packed nanoparticles …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%