2012
DOI: 10.4161/pri.19639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unraveling the neuroprotective mechanisms of PrPCin excitotoxicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), PrP C ‐STI1‐mediated neural progenitor/stem cells self‐renewal (Santos et al . ) and GluR6/PSD‐95 interaction, as well as further JNK3 activation in response to kainate (see Llorens and Del Rio for details).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), PrP C ‐STI1‐mediated neural progenitor/stem cells self‐renewal (Santos et al . ) and GluR6/PSD‐95 interaction, as well as further JNK3 activation in response to kainate (see Llorens and Del Rio for details).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). Several lines of research point to a role in neuroprotection against a wide range of insults, such as excitotoxicity and serum starvation (Llorens and Del Rio ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physiological role of native PrP C remains unclear. 370 It has been shown that the protein is involved in several cellular processes including neuroprotection against excitotoxicity and serum starvation, 371 proliferation and cell-cell adhesion, 370, 372 formation of synapses 373 and ligand binding. 374, 375 PrP can protect cells against heavy metal overloading and subsequent oxidative stress by binding divalent ions of copper, zinc, manganese and nickel.…”
Section: Prions and Prion Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups reported in the mid-90s that PrP C -deficiency translates into impairments in LTP (Clinton et al, 1993; Collinge et al, 1994; Manson et al, 1995) and learning and memory. As with polySia-NCAM1, the presence of PrP C has most often been shown to desensitize NMDARs, making them less responsive to low levels of EtOH, NMDA, kainite, or glutamate (Shyu et al, 2005; Rangel et al, 2007; Carulla et al, 2011; Llorens and Del Rio, 2012; Black et al, 2014). This protective role has, however, not remained unchallenged (Herms et al, 1995) and was, for example, not detected when the influence of PrP on LTP was investigated in hippocampal slices dissected from intercrosses of Prnp knockout mice and an AD mouse model, which itself exhibits an LTP defect (Calella et al, 2010).…”
Section: Prp and Polysia-ncam1mentioning
confidence: 99%