2010
DOI: 10.1093/icb/icq119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unrecognized Antarctic Biodiversity: A Case Study of the Genus Odontaster (Odontasteridae; Asteroidea)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
59
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Before this submission, the class Enteropneusta was essentially unknown from most of the Antarctic region, yet on our expeditions, they were repeatedly observed in camera transects on the continental shelf in east and west Antarctica 8 . These results underscore how poorly the biodiversity of Antarctic shelf fauna is known 18 and that more effort is needed to understand this rapidly changing region. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Before this submission, the class Enteropneusta was essentially unknown from most of the Antarctic region, yet on our expeditions, they were repeatedly observed in camera transects on the continental shelf in east and west Antarctica 8 . These results underscore how poorly the biodiversity of Antarctic shelf fauna is known 18 and that more effort is needed to understand this rapidly changing region. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Cryptic or unrecognized species (Janosik and Halanych, 2010) are commonly identified by mitochondrial DNA studies of benthic invertebrates (For Antarctic examples see Linse et al, 2007;Leese and Held, 2008;Krabbe et al, 2010;Arango et al, 2011;Havermans et al, 2011;Hemery et al, 2012). There is considerable debate as to whether or not biological species should be delimited based solely on mitochondrial DNA sequence data (DeSalle et al, 2005;Taylor and Harris, 2012;Zhang et al, 2013).…”
Section: Crypsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude that the two OTUs therefore either represent a single species, which for unknown reasons is clearly differentiated, or that the two OTUs may be two species, which are genuinely cryptic rather than pseudo-cryptic (Janosik & Halanych, 2010). Although there may be good reasons to flag potentially new species to attract further attention (Wägele, 1994), we do not propose the formal erection of a new species here because it can currently only be reliably identified a posteriori by DNA sequencing.…”
Section: Deep-sea Serolidae 39mentioning
confidence: 86%