Unruly wives in the household: Toward feminist genealogies for peace research

Abstract

<jats:p> Feminist scholars and activists have historically been written out of peace research, despite their strong presence in the early stages of the field. In this article, we develop the concept of “wifesization” to illustrate the process through which feminist and feminized interventions have been reduced to appendages of the field, their contributions appropriated for its development but unworthy of mention as independent producers of knowledge. Wifesization has trickle-down effects, not just for knowledge production, but also for peacebuilding practice. We propose new feminist genealogies for peace research that challenge and redefine the narrow boundaries of the field, in the form of a patchwork quilt including early theorists, utopian writing, oral history, and indigenous knowledge production. Reflections draw on the authors’ engagements with several archives rich in cultures and languages of peace, not reducible to a “single story.” Recovering wifesized feminist contributions to peace research, our article offers a new way of constructing peace research canons that gives weight to long-standing, powerful, and plural feminist voices, in order to make peace scholarship more inclusive and ultimately richer. </jats:p>

Do political quotas work? Gender quotas and women’s political participation in Nepal

“…Despite the gendered character of accounts of Nepal's history, which have systematically silenced women's contributions (see Lyytikäinen et al, 2020), Nepali women have been involved in all of the country's political movements. From the Shah Dynasty to the current era of democratic governments, women have played significant roles in Nepali politics, shaping modern Nepal and Nepalese women's movements.…”

Feminist peace or state co-optation? The Women, Peace and Security agenda in Myanmar

“…Recently, feminist scholars have begun to excavate the early feminist contributions to peace research that were, at the time, written off as 'appendages' to the field (Lyytikäinen et al, 2020), while others have pointed to the importance of examining feminist activists' visions of peace in order to build more sustainable and just forms of peace (O'Reilly, 2016;Paarlberg-Kvam, 2019). These developments converge with recent calls in peace studies to develop more nuanced theoretical conceptions of peace and methodologies that makes it possible to explore them (Davenport et al, 2018;Olivius and Åkebo 2021).…”

Feminist Peace Research in Europe: A Snapshot

“…Feminist peace research in the context of WPS implementation in peacebuilding and beyond is not restricted to the three themes captured so far. For instance, recent leadership in theorizing feminist peace research has been undertaken by Europe-based feminist scholars (Väyrynen et al, 2020;Wibben and Donahoe, 2020;Lyytikäinen et al, 2021). Others have focused on themes like nuclear non-proliferation (Duncanson and Eschle, 2008;Eschle, 2017; peacekeeping (Holvikivi, 2020) and masculinities (Duriesmith, 2020) often straddling peace research, and other subfields of international politics.…”