1996
DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02810-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsteady soil erosion model, analytical solutions and comparison with experimental results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
117
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
11
117
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Possible processes that explain supply variation and the pattern displayed in these figures are the exhaustion of readily available soil from the land and growth of vegetative cover. In addition, Hairsine and Rose (1991) report that during individual storms a protective layer of soil can form to limit detachment of sediment particles, and Sander et al (1996) found that initial high sediment concentrations have a much greater fraction of fine sediments than later concentration values. However, when we tried to find this protective layer under natural conditions, we could not find it (not shown).…”
Section: Similarity Of All Three Watershedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible processes that explain supply variation and the pattern displayed in these figures are the exhaustion of readily available soil from the land and growth of vegetative cover. In addition, Hairsine and Rose (1991) report that during individual storms a protective layer of soil can form to limit detachment of sediment particles, and Sander et al (1996) found that initial high sediment concentrations have a much greater fraction of fine sediments than later concentration values. However, when we tried to find this protective layer under natural conditions, we could not find it (not shown).…”
Section: Similarity Of All Three Watershedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is microtopography and hydraulic conditions that emphasize either the effects of rainfall or those of overland flow. As a first step before further development of the model a single representative particle size is used although the studies of Sander et al [1996], Hairsine et al [1999], Heilig et al [2001], and Beuselinck et al [2002] demonstrate clearly the need for multisize class depositional models. Here we present the model and its evaluation over a plane surface and an illustration of its capabilities to deal with a real topography plot.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[65] Rates k 41 and k 32 are assumed to be zero due to an assumption that neither freely suspended microorganisms nor microorganisms attached to fine sediments settle once entrained in the flow [Sander et al, 1996;Medema et al, 1998]. …”
Section: Parameter Estimation From Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%