2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Ensemble of Ranking Models for News Comments Using Pseudo Answers

Abstract: Ranking comments on an online news service is a practically important task, and thus there have been many studies on this task. Although ensemble techniques are widely known to improve the performance of models, there is little types of research on ensemble neuralranking models. In this paper, we investigate how to improve the performance on the comment-ranking task by using unsupervised ensemble methods. We propose a new hybrid method composed of an output selection method and a typical averaging method. Our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• PostEval: Select the most promising output (or model) per article with a continuous version of majority voting (Kobayashi, 2018), where the similarity of two outputs was calculated with NDCG. • WeightEval: Use the weighted average of the top-k promising outputs (Fujita et al, 2020), where k was chosen with the validation set. This method is a hybrid of output selection (PostEval) and output average (NormAve), where NDCG was used as a similarity function for selecting and weighting.…”
Section: Model Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• PostEval: Select the most promising output (or model) per article with a continuous version of majority voting (Kobayashi, 2018), where the similarity of two outputs was calculated with NDCG. • WeightEval: Use the weighted average of the top-k promising outputs (Fujita et al, 2020), where k was chosen with the validation set. This method is a hybrid of output selection (PostEval) and output average (NormAve), where NDCG was used as a similarity function for selecting and weighting.…”
Section: Model Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…• PostEval: Select the most promising output (or model) per article with a continuous version of majority voting (Kobayashi, 2018), where the similarity of two outputs was calculated with NDCG. • WeightEval: Use the weighted average of the top-k promising outputs (Fujita et al, 2020), where k was chosen with the validation set. This method is a hybrid of output selection (PostEval) and output average (NormAve), where NDCG was used as a similarity function for selecting and weighting.…”
Section: Model Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%