2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised feature dimension reduction for classification of MR spectra

Abstract: We present an unsupervised feature dimension reduction method for the classification of magnetic resonance spectra. The technique preserves spectral information, important for disease profiling. We propose to use this technique as a preprocessing step for computationally demanding wrapper-based feature subset selection. We show that the classification accuracy on an independent test set can be sustained while achieving considerable feature reduction. Our method is applicable to other classification techniques,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Micallef et al (2017) presented a novel approach using an interactive elicitation of knowledge on the feature relevance to guide the selection of features and thus improve the prediction accuracy for small datasets. Another group of studies classifies features into clusters and replaces the feature set with the corresponding feature centroid of the cluster (Baumgartner et al, 2004;Onan, 2017).…”
Section: Learning On Small Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Micallef et al (2017) presented a novel approach using an interactive elicitation of knowledge on the feature relevance to guide the selection of features and thus improve the prediction accuracy for small datasets. Another group of studies classifies features into clusters and replaces the feature set with the corresponding feature centroid of the cluster (Baumgartner et al, 2004;Onan, 2017).…”
Section: Learning On Small Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning on small dataset Increasement of sample size Niyogi et al (1998), Li et al (2003), Li and Wen (2014), Chang et al (2014). Dimensionality reduction Baumgartner et al (2004), Kursa and Rudnicki (2010), Chandrashekar and Sahin (2014), Micallef et al (2017), Mishra and Singh (2020). Learning methods Huang and Moraga (2004), Chen et al (2005), Mao et al (2006), Li and Liu (2009), Li, Chang, et al (2012), Guo et al (2017), Luo and Paal (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช… ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ ๋ถ„์„๊ธฐ์— ์˜ํ•ด์„œ ์ทจ๋“๋œ MRS (magnetic resonance spectra) ์ƒ์ฒด์‹ ํ˜ธ๋Š” ๋†’์€ ์ž…๋ ฅ์ฐจ์› ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ, ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋“ค๊ฐ„ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์ด ๋งค์šฐ ๋†’ ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๋งŽ์€ ์–ด๋ ค์›€์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค [1]. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ž…๋ ฅ์ฐจ์›์ด ๋†’์€ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์˜ ์ถ•์†Œ ์—†์ด ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜ํ•  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ์ €์žฅ์šฉ๋Ÿ‰์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ๋งŽ์€ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ์ฒ˜๋ฆฌ์— ์˜ํ•œ ์†๋„ ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•œ๋‹ค.…”
Section: ์„œ ๋ก unclassified
“…Thus simple, reliable, and rapid screening methods are still in demand to differentiate between C. dubliniensis and C. albicans. We have utilised NMR spectroscopy, combined with classification based on a statistical classification strategy (SCS), for microbial identification and developed a database to identify related, clinically relevant yeast species [11,12]. FTIR spectroscopy was used for identification of C. dubliniensis [8,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTIR spectroscopy was used for identification of C. dubliniensis [8,10]. We have utilised NMR spectroscopy, combined with classification based on a statistical classification strategy (SCS), for microbial identification and developed a database to identify related, clinically relevant yeast species [11,12]. However, only distantly related species have been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%