2023
DOI: 10.32473/flairs.36.133280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Keyword Extraction for Hashtag Recommendation in Social Media

Abstract: Hashtag recommendation aims to suggest hashtags to users to annotate and describe the key information in the text, or categorize their posts. In recent years, several hashtag recommendation methods are proposed and developed to speed up processing of the texts and quickly find out the critical phrases. The methods use different approaches and techniques to obtain critical information from a large amount of data. This paper investigates the efficiency of unsupervised keyword extraction methods for hashtag recom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the inception of a keyword extraction method based on word frequency statistical rules by Luhn [3] in 1957, the development of automatic keyword extraction technologies has evolved over more than seven decades, spawning a multitude of methods. These methods are principally categorized into supervised and unsupervised extraction methods [4]. Although supervised keyword extraction methods can achieve higher extraction accuracy, they require a large volume of annotated data, incurring significant manual labor costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the inception of a keyword extraction method based on word frequency statistical rules by Luhn [3] in 1957, the development of automatic keyword extraction technologies has evolved over more than seven decades, spawning a multitude of methods. These methods are principally categorized into supervised and unsupervised extraction methods [4]. Although supervised keyword extraction methods can achieve higher extraction accuracy, they require a large volume of annotated data, incurring significant manual labor costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%