2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-62392-4_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Learning of Question Difficulty Levels Using Assessment Responses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, such models need a large number of calibrated questions for training, which might be too costly to obtain, especially for smaller institutions. employs a pairwise difficulty comparison scheme similar to the one we will, but they still require the user responses for the algorithm to work, same as (Narayanan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, such models need a large number of calibrated questions for training, which might be too costly to obtain, especially for smaller institutions. employs a pairwise difficulty comparison scheme similar to the one we will, but they still require the user responses for the algorithm to work, same as (Narayanan et al, 2017).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the correct rate of the same student answering questions with similar difficulty or discrimination at the same knowledge concept is similar. Some existing work that study attributes of questions is primarily about mining them [5]. Other work try to use attributes of questions in knowledge tracing [6], but they do not specifically apply question attributes to deep knowledge tracing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common method to obtain a valid and reliable DL is by collecting sufficient student performance data and report an Item Difficulty Level [10], [11] and a Discrimination Index [10]. Automated methods such as the accumulative test by Sokolova et al [12], the Question Classifier Engine by Narayanan et al [13], or the algorithm based on a Monte-Carlo approach by Sud et al [14] require actual student performance as input data. Therefore, it would be more efficient if we could rely on expert predictions of DL from.…”
Section: Background and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%