2022
DOI: 10.1117/1.jei.31.3.033017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised person re-identification via local manifold consistency learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, our proposed method exhibits superior performance on all three datasets compared to other camera-aware learning methods. For example, our method obtains 1.4% Rank-1 and 2.9% mAP increase on Market-1501, and 0.7% Rank-1 and 0.9% mAP increase on DukeMTMC compared with the second-best camera-aware approach LMCL 7 . The main differences between LMCL 7 and our JGPP exist in the approach of exploiting comprehensive features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Notably, our proposed method exhibits superior performance on all three datasets compared to other camera-aware learning methods. For example, our method obtains 1.4% Rank-1 and 2.9% mAP increase on Market-1501, and 0.7% Rank-1 and 0.9% mAP increase on DukeMTMC compared with the second-best camera-aware approach LMCL 7 . The main differences between LMCL 7 and our JGPP exist in the approach of exploiting comprehensive features.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…For example, our method obtains 1.4% Rank-1 and 2.9% mAP increase on Market-1501, and 0.7% Rank-1 and 0.9% mAP increase on DukeMTMC compared with the second-best camera-aware approach LMCL. 7 The main differences between LMCL 7 and our JGPP exist in the approach of exploiting comprehensive features. LMCL 7 crops the image into different regions randomly and selectively focuses on more relevant regions with an attention mechanism.…”
Section: Comparison Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations