Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3018661.3018668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unsupervised Ranking using Graph Structures and Node Attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a nutshell, an embedding algorithm learns a latent vector representation that maps each vertex v in the graph G to a single d dimensional vector. This area has found strong applications, as the embedding representation of nodes leads to improved results in data mining and machine learning tasks, such as node classification [37], user profiling [39], ranking [26], and link prediction [2,25]. In virtually all cases, the crucial assumption of the embedding methods developed so far is that a single embedding vector has to be learned for each node in the graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a nutshell, an embedding algorithm learns a latent vector representation that maps each vertex v in the graph G to a single d dimensional vector. This area has found strong applications, as the embedding representation of nodes leads to improved results in data mining and machine learning tasks, such as node classification [37], user profiling [39], ranking [26], and link prediction [2,25]. In virtually all cases, the crucial assumption of the embedding methods developed so far is that a single embedding vector has to be learned for each node in the graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest structure-based solutions to rank nodes were based on centrality-based metrics [17], such as degree centrality [18], closeness centrality [17] and betweenness centrality [19] derived in the research field of social networks [20]. PageRank [6] and HITS [21] were subsequently proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was compared with various search engines and concluded that the design of the method is based on increasing the reliability of the results retrieved by the MSE. Also, in [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] algorithms based on various mechanisms such as anthology and non-regulatory algorithms, and etc. are presented for ranking web pages.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%