“…In sharp contrast, almost all imidazolium salts ( R 1 IR 2 ) exhibited a stronger antibacterial effect, including against ESBL-EC and MRSA ( p > 2.4). The antibacterial efficiency of R 1 IR 2 is quite similar to that of dehydroepiandrosterone-derived ( Hryniewicka et al, 2021 ), peptide-conjugated ( Reinhardt et al, 2014 ), ethoxyether-functionalized ( Huang et al, 2011 ), amino acid–derived ( Valls et al, 2020 ), polydiacetylene-conjugated ( Lee et al, 2016 ), and unsymmetrically substituted ( Çoban et al, 2017 ; Duman et al, 2019 ) imidazolium salts in previous reports. Furthermore, the antibacterial activity of imidazolium salts ( R 1 IR 2 ) increased following the substitution of methyl and bromobenzyl with dibromobenzyl groups and the change from one to two dibromobenzyl groups ( Table 3 ).…”