1997
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untangling the Appraisal-Emotion Connection

Abstract: This article aims to clarify the nature of the relation between cognitive appraisal and emotion. I distinguish a range of alternative possible hypotheses according to whether this appraisal-emotion connection is assumed to operate at the conceptual or empirical level, whether it is supposed to be a descriptive or causal relation, and whether it is seen as having a contingent or necessary basis. Reviewing the varieties of available evidence for connections at different levels, find little support for empirical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
1
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
115
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, such findings contrast with statements that emphasise that an emotion is always accompanied by the same pattern of appraisals (e.g., Roseman & Smith, 2001;Smith & Kirby, 2004), but resonates with statements from other authors that questioned that an emotion can only follow from the generally predicted appraisal pattern for that emotion (e.g., Frijda & Zeelenberg, 2001;Parkinson, 1997Parkinson, , 2001Scherer, 2001;Shweder, 1993).…”
Section: Implications For Theories Of Appraisal and Angercontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…In general, such findings contrast with statements that emphasise that an emotion is always accompanied by the same pattern of appraisals (e.g., Roseman & Smith, 2001;Smith & Kirby, 2004), but resonates with statements from other authors that questioned that an emotion can only follow from the generally predicted appraisal pattern for that emotion (e.g., Frijda & Zeelenberg, 2001;Parkinson, 1997Parkinson, , 2001Scherer, 2001;Shweder, 1993).…”
Section: Implications For Theories Of Appraisal and Angercontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…However, the nature of the relation between emotions and their components has not been given the coverage it deserves (Parkinson, 1997(Parkinson, , 1999. Also, it is surprising to find that only minimal research has addressed this issue directly.…”
Section: The Nature Of Relation Between Components and Emotionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some theorists argue for a strong causal relationship between appraisals and emotions (e.g., Lazarus, 1991). Others argue that although appraisals do not always cause the emotions or determine which specific emotion is experienced, they may characterize emotions (Parkinson, 1997). In our appraisal study we focused on the appraisal pattern of six different negative emotions, but for the sake of brevity we will only discuss the relations between regret and disappointment (see, .…”
Section: Are Regret and Disappointment Different Emotions?mentioning
confidence: 99%