Handbuch Der Schulforschung 2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-663-10249-6_28
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unterrichts- und Lehr-Lern-Forschung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The model seems practicable because it can be implemented to differing degrees and with differing focuses; it is flexible enough to be adapted to different contexts and conditions (e.g., different schools, classes, etc.). From the perspective of instructional research, it is also worth noting that the risk of negative effects on academic outcomes -as have been found for some radical concepts of "open education" (Giaconia & Hedges, 1982;Gruehn, 2000;Lüders & Rauin, 2004) -is limited: unlike radical reform concepts, the ETL model includes forms of direct instruction, which numerous empirical studies have shown to play an important role in student learning (see, e.e., Brophy, 1999;Helmke, 2009). Given the ETL model's positive effects on student perceptions and experiences of instruction -and in view of findings from international empirical studies demonstrating positive effects of student-oriented instruction and good teacher-student relations (Cornelius-White, 2007) -one potential point of intervention for developing teacher expertise in the culture of teaching and learning would therefore be to encourage the more widespread implementation of the ETL reform model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model seems practicable because it can be implemented to differing degrees and with differing focuses; it is flexible enough to be adapted to different contexts and conditions (e.g., different schools, classes, etc.). From the perspective of instructional research, it is also worth noting that the risk of negative effects on academic outcomes -as have been found for some radical concepts of "open education" (Giaconia & Hedges, 1982;Gruehn, 2000;Lüders & Rauin, 2004) -is limited: unlike radical reform concepts, the ETL model includes forms of direct instruction, which numerous empirical studies have shown to play an important role in student learning (see, e.e., Brophy, 1999;Helmke, 2009). Given the ETL model's positive effects on student perceptions and experiences of instruction -and in view of findings from international empirical studies demonstrating positive effects of student-oriented instruction and good teacher-student relations (Cornelius-White, 2007) -one potential point of intervention for developing teacher expertise in the culture of teaching and learning would therefore be to encourage the more widespread implementation of the ETL reform model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important in heterogeneous classes, in which student performance highly differs. Some studies show that differentiated instruction has advantages for social learning compared to traditional teaching (e.g., Lüders & Rauin, 2004;Trautmann & Wischer, 2011). Especially, cooperative approaches such as peerassisted learning strategies or reciprocal teaching involving tutors and tutees of different ability levels (Chatoupis & Vagenas, 2018;Fuchs et al, 1997;Hattie, 2009;Palincsar & Brown, 1984;Pilten, 2016) stimulate classroom settings and lead students to perceive performance-related heterogeneity in the classroom positively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinder können in einem solchen Unterricht also selbst entscheiden, wo, wann und mit wem sie lernen, die Inhalte sind aber meist festgelegt (Hartinger, 2005). Viele Untersuchungen finden Vorteile des Offenen Unterrichts für das Erreichen nicht-fachlicher Ziele, wie etwa Motivation, Interesse, Selbstvertrauen und Selbstständigkeit (Lüders & Rauin, 2004). Beim Erreichen fachlicher Ziele finden sich im Vergleich zu geschlossenen, lehrerzentrierten Formen des Unterrichts hingegen keine Vorteile; einige Studien finden klare Nachteile (Lüders & Rauin, 2004), andere berichten keine Unterschiede (Giaconia & Hedges, 1982;Pauli, Reusser & Grob, 2010).…”
Section: Herausforderungen Und Grenzen Der Inneren Differenzierungunclassified