2nd International Conference on Data, Engineering and Applications (IDEA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/idea49133.2020.9170704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unusual Crowd Activity Detection using OpenCV and Motion Influence Map

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experiments and proposed deep learning framework were carried out using a single NVIDIA graphics processing unit (GPU) and an Intel Core i7 3.4GHz processor with 32GB random-access memory (RAM) and a 32GB NVIDIA graphics card, all of which were configured using CUDA-optimized architecture and the open source computer vision library (OpenCV) deep learning framework. The suggested method is compared to the state-of-the-art unusual activity detection methods [29], [30], social force models [31], sparse representation-based method [32], and mixture of dynamic textures-based method [32]. True positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), equal error rate (ERR), true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), and area under curve (AUC) are some common performance measuring metrics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The experiments and proposed deep learning framework were carried out using a single NVIDIA graphics processing unit (GPU) and an Intel Core i7 3.4GHz processor with 32GB random-access memory (RAM) and a 32GB NVIDIA graphics card, all of which were configured using CUDA-optimized architecture and the open source computer vision library (OpenCV) deep learning framework. The suggested method is compared to the state-of-the-art unusual activity detection methods [29], [30], social force models [31], sparse representation-based method [32], and mixture of dynamic textures-based method [32]. True positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), equal error rate (ERR), true positive rate (TPR), true negative rate (TNR), and area under curve (AUC) are some common performance measuring metrics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we have performed experiments on University of Minnesota anomaly detection dataset. Figure 3 shows the receiving operating curve (ROC) for the proposed and existing approach presented in [31], [32]. Similarly, we have computed the ROC for the proposed student behavior dataset in Figure 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed technique was used to compare the social force model of [58], sparse representation of [55], and mixture of dynamic textures method of [40], [59], [60]. The performance is assessed using standard performance evaluation metrics.…”
Section: Suspicious Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we ran tests using the dataset for anomaly detection from the University of Minnesota. The Receiving Operating Curve (ROC) for the proposed and current technique described in [55] is shown in Fig. 15.…”
Section: Suspicious Activity Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%