2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.98.060410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling the mechanisms of the spin Hall effect in Ta

Abstract: Spin-to-charge current interconversions are widely exploited for the generation and detection of pure spin currents and are key ingredients for future spintronic devices including spin-orbit torques and spin-orbit logic circuits. In case of the spin Hall effect, different mechanisms contribute to the phenomenon and determining the leading contribution is peremptory for achieving the largest conversion efficiencies. Here, we experimentally demonstrate the dominance of the intrinsic mechanism of the spin Hall ef… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
64
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
7
64
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, we find that, for 2 values similar or longer than the thickness of MoTe2 (11 nm), | | tends to a low constant value independent of 2 , because the SCC process is limited by the MoTe2 thickness. This behavior allows us to get a lower limit for | |, which for the case of the conventional component is | | ≥ 0.21 at room temperature, comparable to the best known spin Hall metals 24,25 and alloys 23,44 . The lower limit for the unconventional component efficiency is also found to be remarkably large (| | ≥ 0.10), and with opposite sign, at room temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the one hand, we find that, for 2 values similar or longer than the thickness of MoTe2 (11 nm), | | tends to a low constant value independent of 2 , because the SCC process is limited by the MoTe2 thickness. This behavior allows us to get a lower limit for | |, which for the case of the conventional component is | | ≥ 0.21 at room temperature, comparable to the best known spin Hall metals 24,25 and alloys 23,44 . The lower limit for the unconventional component efficiency is also found to be remarkably large (| | ≥ 0.10), and with opposite sign, at room temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…On the other hand, for 2 values much smaller than the MoTe2 thickness, it is the | | 2 product that tends to a low constant value, which is what defines the SCC efficiency 45,46 . This allows us to give a lower limit for | | 2 , which for the case of the conventional component is | | 2 ≥ 1.15 nm at room temperature, much larger than heavy metals (~0.1−0.3 nm) 24,25 . If we assume that the SCC originates at the surface states of MoTe2, this product would correspond to the Edelstein length ( ), the efficiency associated to the inverse Edelstein effect.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spin Hall materials are usually found either among elemental metals with strong SOC [35][36][37] or novel topological phases, such as Weyl and Dirac nodal line semimetals where spin-orbit protected gaps between the electronic bands are crossed by the Fermi level. [38][39][40] It has also been known that a giant Rashba effect (RE) could induce large SHC as long as the Fermi level can be tuned and brought between lower and upper Rashba bands.…”
Section: Electronic Properties and Spin Hall Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further characterize the spin Hall conductivity of W by analyzing the relation between | ξDL | and the measured W layers' resistivity false(ρWfalse). The spin Hall conductivity | σSH |=false| ξDL false|/ρW can be extracted from the linear slope of | ξDL | versus ρnormalW plot, if the observed SHE is intrinsic in nature . Interestingly, there exists two linear regimes, which correspond to | σSHα‐W |3.71×105 normalΩ1 normalm1 for α‐W‐dominated samples and | σSHamorphous‐W |1.05×105 normalΩ1 normalm1 for amorphous‐W‐dominated samples (Figure b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%