“…Although organic materials, represented by poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)-poly (styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), 32 have also been explored for thermoelectrics, their performance is F I G U R E 1 (A) Timeline and progress in thermoelectric conversion efficiency represented for conventional inorganic [27][28][29][30][31] and organic thermoelectric materials, 32,[146][147][148][149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156][157] as well as the emerging MHPs. 21,22,51,54,67,74,[158][159][160][161][162] The gray dashed line represents the theoretical ZT range of MHPs, [33][34][35][36] limited by their relatively low mobility, limiting their efficiency as thermoelectric generators. On the other hand, MHPs offer a promising alternative for thermoelectric applications due to their unique properties, combining the high mobility 24 of inorganic materials with the ultralow thermal conductivity [19][20][21] and facile processing 4,10,11,14 of organic materials (see Figure 1B), making them a strong ...…”