2020
DOI: 10.3389/fnsyn.2020.00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unveiling the Synaptic Function and Structure Using Paired Recordings From Synaptically Coupled Neurons

Abstract: Synaptic transmission between neurons is the basic mechanism for information processing in cortical microcircuits. To date, paired recording from synaptically coupled neurons is the most widely used method which allows a detailed functional characterization of unitary synaptic transmission at the cellular and synaptic level in combination with a structural characterization of both pre-and postsynaptic neurons at the light and electron microscopic level. In this review, we will summarize the many applications o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 178 publications
(230 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be achieved by recording from multiple neurons within the same brain slice ( Table 1 ). Stimulating one neuron while recording postsynaptic responses in neighbouring neurons allows detection of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections ( Qi et al, 2020 ). This “multipatch” approach has been successful in characterizing properties of synapses between different local cell types in various brain regions ( Jiang et al, 2015 ; Peng et al, 2017 ; Peng et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Neural Recording Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by recording from multiple neurons within the same brain slice ( Table 1 ). Stimulating one neuron while recording postsynaptic responses in neighbouring neurons allows detection of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic connections ( Qi et al, 2020 ). This “multipatch” approach has been successful in characterizing properties of synapses between different local cell types in various brain regions ( Jiang et al, 2015 ; Peng et al, 2017 ; Peng et al, 2021 ).…”
Section: Neural Recording Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threedimensional volume electron microscopy reveals the physical connectivity among cells within volumes of cortex, but identifying different cell types within these blocks based on criteria such as long-range axonal targets or transcriptomic classes remains challenging, and the functional properties of the synapses cannot be fully ascertained (Briggman and Bock, 2012;Helmstaedter, 2013;Kubota et al, 2018). Performing paired whole-cell recordings of unitary synaptic connections followed by cell filling and morphological reconstruction is also laborious (Miles and Poncer, 1996;Thomson and Lamy, 2007;Qi et al, 2020). Importantly, these technical limitations have also hindered the ability to test for effects of perturbations of processes hypothesized to underlie the development of intracortical synaptic connections.…”
Section: Beyond Peters' Rule: the Challenge Of Identifying Additional Cell-type-dependent Developmental Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to dense, EM-based reconstruction of neuronal circuits, which allows for the perhaps most comprehensive characterization of synaptic connectivity, important alternative circuit-mapping tools exist. The two most widely used techniques are viral retrograde and anterograde trans-synaptic labeling of neurons [ 6 , 26 ], and whole-cell patch-clamp recordings [ 27 ]. Patch-clamp recordings are the gold standard to infer synaptic function and have been widely applied to characterize synaptic connections among pre- and postsynaptic neurons, including the strength of their excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs/IPSPs), the time course of the postsynaptic responses, and the reliability of synaptic transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the data obtained from patch-clamp recordings have provided essential information on the mechanisms underlying neuronal circuit computation, that, so far, could not be provided by EM-based reconstructions. This holds particularly for patch-clamp studies that were performed in vivo [ 28 ], which do not suffer from potential slicing artifacts [ 27 ]. Despite attempts to automate and scale up patch clamping procedures [ 29 ], the throughput for connectivity studies has remained comparably low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%