2018
DOI: 10.1107/s2052252518012058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unwarping GISAXS data

Abstract: Grazing-incidence X-ray-scattering (GISAXS) images contain distortions caused by refraction and multiple scattering. A new method is presented for computationally unwarping GISAXS data. The experimental data are iteratively fitted to reconstruct an estimate of the true underlying reciprocal-space scattering.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…by 'unwarping' the four terms of the GISAS cross section (Liu & Yager, 2018). One possible approach to this problem consists of reducing the task of data analysis by advanced data reduction, e.g.…”
Section: Beyond Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…by 'unwarping' the four terms of the GISAS cross section (Liu & Yager, 2018). One possible approach to this problem consists of reducing the task of data analysis by advanced data reduction, e.g.…”
Section: Beyond Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible approach to this problem consists of reducing the task of data analysis by advanced data reduction, e.g. by 'unwarping' the four terms of the GISAS cross section (Liu & Yager, 2018). This may be worth a re-implementation within BornAgain.…”
Section: Beyond Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10) are not significantly affected by this approximation. Research into accurate unwarping of scattering images is ongoing (Liu & Yager, 2018).…”
Section: Usage Example For Scattering Intensity Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the real component of the index of refraction () for the liquid is smaller than the real component of the index of refraction for the solid, as is typical for most water-solid interfaces at X-ray energies, the actual angle through which the X-rays are diffracted (2 B ) is smaller than the apparent diffraction angle (2 app ). This effect is well known in GIXRD, and corrections for this effect at vacuum-material interfaces (where the refractive index in a vacuum is defined to be one) have been developed (Toney & Brennan, 1989;Lim et al, 1987;Liu & Yager, 2018;Busch et al, 2006;Lee et al, 2005;Breiby et al, 2008). However, at liquid-solid interfaces, we must consider the value of the refractive index on both sides of the interface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%