2020
DOI: 10.24918/cs.2020.47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unwrapping Enzyme Kinetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study investigates the use of these practices on student learning and confidence of enzyme kinetics and thermodynamics in an introductory biology course. A wide variety of active learning methods exist for teaching enzyme kinetics; they include use of toothpicks, beans (Hinckley, 2012), marbles (Runge et al, 2006), nuts and bolts (Junker, 2010; Lechner, 2011; Silverstein, 2011), pennies (House et al, 2016), modeling clay (Friedman & Terry, 2020), or candy (Berndsen et al, 2020). Assessment of an activity using plastic building bricks in a cell biology course demonstrated student improvements in interpreting and discussing Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk graphs and the effects of substrate concentration and addition of competitive and noncompetitive inhibitors (Darling et al, 2021), as well as improvements in students visualizing V max and K m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This study investigates the use of these practices on student learning and confidence of enzyme kinetics and thermodynamics in an introductory biology course. A wide variety of active learning methods exist for teaching enzyme kinetics; they include use of toothpicks, beans (Hinckley, 2012), marbles (Runge et al, 2006), nuts and bolts (Junker, 2010; Lechner, 2011; Silverstein, 2011), pennies (House et al, 2016), modeling clay (Friedman & Terry, 2020), or candy (Berndsen et al, 2020). Assessment of an activity using plastic building bricks in a cell biology course demonstrated student improvements in interpreting and discussing Michaelis-Menten and Lineweaver-Burk graphs and the effects of substrate concentration and addition of competitive and noncompetitive inhibitors (Darling et al, 2021), as well as improvements in students visualizing V max and K m .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interviews, concept inventories, and writing exercises conducted by several research groups have identified common challenges and misconceptions relating to energy, enzyme kinetics, and enzymatic interactions (Bretz & Linenberger, 2012; Halim et al, 2018) that we have taken into consideration in our instructional plan. Challenges include visualizing V max and K m (Runge et al, 2006; Darling et al, 2021; Berndsen et al, 2020), interpreting graphs with rates or unfamiliar representations of time (Rodriguez et al, 2019; Rodriguez & Towns, 2020), and identifying if energy is absorbed or released when bonds form or are broken (Bain & Towns, 2018). Fostering student reasoning of core concepts that relate to diverse disciplinary contexts may help to reinforce learning of Gibbs energy and enzyme kinetics that are often presented as separate topics in texts (Bain & Towns, 2018; Bearne, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations