2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10812-018-0575-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upconversion of IR Radiation in a KGd(WO4)2 Crystal on Erbium and Thulium Ions in Trace Concentrations: Change of Excitation Schemes and Energy Transfer Through the Crystal Lattice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 (+ points) shows that for different segments of the curve, in the Log-Log representation of this dependency, the parameter depicting the slope is n ≈ 1.5, 3.2 and 2.1, respectively. For the initial and end parts of the curve, n ≈ 2, which indicates the excitation of green emission by 2 pump photons [23], while in intermediate region parameter n is more than three, as it is usually observed, when a photon avalanche occurs [11,14]. However this behavior cannot be caused by the excitation of a photon avalanche, since the concentration of erbium ions is insufficient for an efficient exchange of energy between them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 (+ points) shows that for different segments of the curve, in the Log-Log representation of this dependency, the parameter depicting the slope is n ≈ 1.5, 3.2 and 2.1, respectively. For the initial and end parts of the curve, n ≈ 2, which indicates the excitation of green emission by 2 pump photons [23], while in intermediate region parameter n is more than three, as it is usually observed, when a photon avalanche occurs [11,14]. However this behavior cannot be caused by the excitation of a photon avalanche, since the concentration of erbium ions is insufficient for an efficient exchange of energy between them.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…, with parameters W32=23800 c -1 , W31=2300 c -1 and W21=100c -1 specific for Er 3+ :KGW [22][23][24][25]. All numerical calculations presented in the article are performed with these parameter values.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%