2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2020.106467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upcycling coal liquefaction residue into sulfur-rich activated carbon for efficient Hg0 removal from coal-fired flue gas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LCVCs have higher content of mineral than usual coal, and the Hg content in LCVCs is also greater than that in usual coal [ 14 ]. As a result, the Hg emission behaviour from LCVCs combustion will possibly be much different to that from coal combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LCVCs have higher content of mineral than usual coal, and the Hg content in LCVCs is also greater than that in usual coal [ 14 ]. As a result, the Hg emission behaviour from LCVCs combustion will possibly be much different to that from coal combustion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 often used to add active sites on AC to improve its Hg 0 removal ability. 18 Sulfur impregnation has been verified to considerably enhance the capacity of AC adsorbents to adsorb Hg 0 . 19,20 Zhu et al 21 proposed the use of sulfurimpregnated activated petroleum coke for mercury adsorption and demonstrated its high efficiency in mercury removal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study shows that the sulfur-impregnated AC fibers can effectively improve the sulfur-containing functional groups on the surface of the ACFs and increase the chemical active sites for mercury removal. Chen et al 18 indicated that coal liquefaction residue was a potential sorbent for synthesizing highly efficient sulfur-modified AC for Hg 0 removal from flue gas. In many preparation methods, porous materials with a high specific surface area were sulfurized using SO 2 or H 2 S gas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, previous studies pay more attention on using better sorbent to remove heavy metals from flue gas. Some studies have reported that active carbon (AC) material also has a positive RE on heavy metals from flue gas, and then the FF can further capture the heavy metals adsorbed in AC and particles. Chen et al have studied the controlling efficiency of four sorbents for heavy metals, which follow a decreasing sequence of limestone, water, kaolinite, and aluminum oxide .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%