2017
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.2895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update in Hospital Palliative Care: Symptom Management, Communication, Caregiver Outcomes, and Moral Distress

Abstract: Recent research provides important guidance for clinicians caring for hospitalized patients with serious illnesses, including symptom management, ACP, moral distress, and outcomes of critical illness.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,13 In particular, Hayver et al identify that the provision of futile treatments contributes to moral distress in physician trainees. 14 The results of the present Australian study also reflect the ethical issues associated with physician emotional and moral distress reported for MET teams in Italy. 15 Conflict with ward physicians and dealing with families unprepared for EOLC were the most commonly Benefit to the patient 'Providing comfort to the patient and their family' 'Seeing the family and patient relieved that dignity and symptom alleviation are now the main priority' Supporting staff 'Support for junior covering staff reduces their emotional distress' 'Seeing ward staff relieved that their advocacy for the patient is being heard' Facilitating goals of care discussions 'Ability to facilitate and direct end of life care decision making to produce the best outcome for the patient' What are the three most challenging aspects of managing an end of life care MET call?…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12,13 In particular, Hayver et al identify that the provision of futile treatments contributes to moral distress in physician trainees. 14 The results of the present Australian study also reflect the ethical issues associated with physician emotional and moral distress reported for MET teams in Italy. 15 Conflict with ward physicians and dealing with families unprepared for EOLC were the most commonly Benefit to the patient 'Providing comfort to the patient and their family' 'Seeing the family and patient relieved that dignity and symptom alleviation are now the main priority' Supporting staff 'Support for junior covering staff reduces their emotional distress' 'Seeing ward staff relieved that their advocacy for the patient is being heard' Facilitating goals of care discussions 'Ability to facilitate and direct end of life care decision making to produce the best outcome for the patient' What are the three most challenging aspects of managing an end of life care MET call?…”
Section: Comparison With Previous Studiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…In particular, Hayver et al . identify that the provision of futile treatments contributes to moral distress in physician trainees 14 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextual factors such as the employ of perceived futile care,2 97 99 100 108 115 116 120 121 130 131 134 157 161 162 167 171 177–179 resource constraints leading to prioritisation of care between patients,4 85 91 97 99 100 107 108 114 116 117 121 132 135–137 140 143 144 164 166 167 180–185 institutional rules, policies and organisational pressures that prevent physicians from providing appropriate patient care,4 85 94 99 113 114 120 124 140 147 150 151 153 166 168 175 177 180 185 186 and the disconnect between perceived ethical practice and delivered clinical practice predispose to MD 97 109 112 152 160 187…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed this SSR in SEBA reveals that physicians also include contextual, practice, environmental, cultural, community and institutional factors, resource limitations and allocations, quality of care and ethical dilemmas2 33 108 117 118 125 132 138 143 148 180 186 and personal factors including feelings of powerlessness and ‘attacks’ on their integrity,89 99 106 113 personal values,116 professional codes172 and existential beliefs105 139 166 171 as situational constructs that shape their personal constructs within their rings of personhood 3 38. Personal factors including gender, specialty, personality traits, principles, values, beliefs, experiences, circumstances and the availability of support mechanisms psychoemotional states, familial issues, and sociocultural factors also influences the perceptions and responses to MD 2 6–11 97 99 100 108 115 116 120 121 130 131 134 157 161 162 167 171 177–179. This combination of personal and situational constructs may explain the individual variations in the nature, intensity, duration and onset of anger, frustration, sadness, depression and or guilt1 89 90 94 97 104–107 113 115 119 120 122 123 136 137 143 151 154 157 160 164 168 173 188 and the presence of ‘distress’ even when the ‘right’ action is taken2 85 89 94 98 105 116 118 119 124 129 133 140 141 146 151 156 157 161 164 165 167 172 177 179 201 202 among reports of MD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%