X-Ray and Vacuum Ultraviolet Interaction Data Bases, Calculations, and Measurements 1988
DOI: 10.1117/12.945483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Update Of Our 1982 Low Energy X-Ray Photoabsorption And Scattering Factor Tables

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the convenience of the readers and also for comparison with other data, in Figure 1a we show the 1989 update, extension and revision of the widely-used semi-empirical tables [3,4]. This revision includes some of our preliminary broad range data for Ti, -5-Cr, Ni and Cu which we show here respectively in Figure 1b, 1c, 1e and 1f.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the convenience of the readers and also for comparison with other data, in Figure 1a we show the 1989 update, extension and revision of the widely-used semi-empirical tables [3,4]. This revision includes some of our preliminary broad range data for Ti, -5-Cr, Ni and Cu which we show here respectively in Figure 1b, 1c, 1e and 1f.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A perusal of current photoabsorption cross sections which bracket the 2p thresholds of 3d transition metals Ca-Cu requires more and better measurements to refine theoretical methodologies [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we could convert the incident angle to the detection depth based on the method reported in Refs. [23][24][25], by considering an X-ray wavelength of 1.54 Å and electron density of 0.963 Å −3 , calculated by assuming a 3.22 g cm −3 density of 4H-SiC. A more detailed explanation has been described in our previous paper (Ref .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rcflectivity peaks measured at an angle a = 60 ° with respect to the surface normal lie in the "water window" (2.4-4.4 rim). The rcflectivity values in the peak are considerably lower than those expected for an ideal multilayer system of Mo and Si (tr = 0 nm), for which a calculation using the optical constants of Henke and coworkers [18] results in 4.3% for s-polarized light. The increase in roughness from 0.2 nm at the bottom to 0.4 nm at the top of the stack reduces this value by almost a factor of 2.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%