Background: The challenge of 'safe blood' practice has given rise to several unanswered questions in the practice of immune-hematology and has led to controversies as to which algorithm adopted for HIV testing in prospective blood donors pose the least risk and provide safe blood to recipients of blood transfusion. The aim of this study is to evaluate HIV epidemiology and the outcomes of CDC-UMD serial algorithm II for HIV antibody testing in our resource-limited setting by advancing HIV screening beyond serologic procedure.
Material and Methods:A total of 140 prospective blood donors were enrolled in the study between November, 2014 and July, 2015 by consecutive sampling technique. Study used HIV antibody screening based on serial algorithm II as the first-line testing protocol followed by ELISA technique. HIV-DNA confirmation and HIV-RNA quantification were carried out on pooled DBS and plasma samples respectively using real-time PCR.
Results:The overall mean age and gender ratio of PBD were 27.9±7.9 years and 1.1:1. Chi square analysis revealed that the PBD had the right knowledge of all the routes of HIV transmission (χ2 range: 63.3 -212.7, p< 0.05). Study showed an overall HIV prevalence of 2.9% irrespective of assay technique with intercategory variation in prevalence. Pooled sero-negative DBS samples analysis by real-time PCR showed absence of occult HIV infection among PBD and viral load of confirmed positive blood donors revealed low viraemia (least being 25copies/ mL).
Conclusion:Based on the study findings, HIV rapid antibody testing based on serial algorithm II did not compromise 'safe blood practice'. Adoption of rapid HIV antibody techniques based on serial algorithm II can serve as a surrogate HIV confirmatory technique in PBD where facilities for ELISA or the more costly realtime PCR are unavailable.