2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.10.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upfront Gamma Knife Surgery for Giant Central Neurocytoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the risks of surgery-related morbidity and mortality are not negligible, but some studies have reported the effectiveness of primary SRS for CNs. 20,21 Before the era of SRS, conventional fractionated RT was a common noninvasive approach used to manage residual or recurrent CNs after resection. 2,7,32 The effectiveness of RT for recurrent or residual CNs has been reported with high tumor control rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the risks of surgery-related morbidity and mortality are not negligible, but some studies have reported the effectiveness of primary SRS for CNs. 20,21 Before the era of SRS, conventional fractionated RT was a common noninvasive approach used to manage residual or recurrent CNs after resection. 2,7,32 The effectiveness of RT for recurrent or residual CNs has been reported with high tumor control rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for CNs has been reported, with a high rate of tumor control and a low complication rate. 12,[18][19][20][21][22][23] To our knowledge, a limited number of studies have evaluated the usefulness of SRS as a primary treat-ment for CNs. 8,12,24,25 The goal of this study was to report a single-center experience with GKRS as a primary treatment for CNs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, local control of GKR for central neurocytoma was 92.2%, which supported the efficacy of GKR for central neurocytoma. [7,15,20] In these studies, stereotactic radiosurgery was usually performed on asymptomatic, relatively small tumors in the absence of hydrocephalus. In addition, even with hydrocephalus symptoms, GKR with ETV can be performed when the tumors are placed deep in a location where surgical access was difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported the effectiveness of stereotactic radiosurgery. [7,8] In particular, recurring cases, deep-seated lesions with difficult surgical access, or high operative risks, such as old age or general weakness, have been treated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] Upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) achieves good tumor control rates for biopsy-proven CNs, even in some cases of large tumors. 11 The tumor control rates are high with both conventional fractionated external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and SRS, but the incidence of adverse radiation effects (AREs) may be lower after SRS (3%-20% with SRS vs 60% with EBRT). 4,[12][13][14] However, while SRS ameliorates the risk of AREs with its focused targeting and steep dose falloff, the potential for distant (out-field) recurrence remains with this therapeutic modality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%