2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10596-019-09921-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upscaled discrete fracture matrix model (UDFM): an octree-refined continuum representation of fractured porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high fidelity of the simulations allows for the detailed examination of the flow field within each fracture network, thereby providing a basis to develop quantitative measurements of the degree of flow channeling, which is a principal contribution of this work. We use a DFN model rather than a continuum representation because fractures are explicitly represented in a DFN, which allows us to link their attributes directly with flow and transport phenomena (Hadgu et al., 2017; Painter & Cvetkovic, 2005; Sweeney et al., 2020). The networks are semigeneric, meaning that they do not represent a particular field site, but their properties are motivated by field observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high fidelity of the simulations allows for the detailed examination of the flow field within each fracture network, thereby providing a basis to develop quantitative measurements of the degree of flow channeling, which is a principal contribution of this work. We use a DFN model rather than a continuum representation because fractures are explicitly represented in a DFN, which allows us to link their attributes directly with flow and transport phenomena (Hadgu et al., 2017; Painter & Cvetkovic, 2005; Sweeney et al., 2020). The networks are semigeneric, meaning that they do not represent a particular field site, but their properties are motivated by field observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Berre et al 2018, for a recent overview). The cost associated with DFN models is substantially higher than conventional continuum models, but the trade off is that DFN models can typically represent a wider range of transport phenomena with higher fidelity due to the inclusion of detailed features of the fracture network (Hadgu et al, 2017; Hyman et al, 2019a; Painter et al, 2002; Sweeney et al, 2019). The inclusion of these features introduces additional layers of uncertainty because more parameters have to be calibrated and/or sampled due to uncertainty in fracture location, size, orientation, and hydrological properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Rajeh et al [29] developed a modified semianalytical superposition method considering the hydraulic conductivity of the porous matrix and the fractures, as well as the connectivity of the conductive fracture network. Sweeney et al [30] presented a computational geometry-based upscaling approach to accurately capture the dynamic processes considering the fracture geometric properties and the matrix properties. We should note that flow can also occur between disconnected fractures if the rock mass has some porosity and permeability, which would mean some differences in calculations of equivalent permeability [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%