2018
DOI: 10.31223/osf.io/xewqm
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upscaling permeability in anisotropic volcanic systems

Abstract: Permeability is an increasingly prevalent metric included in volcano modelling; however, it is a property that can exhibit anisotropy in volcanic environments. Permeability of a layered medium can be described by the arithmetic or harmonic means of the permeabilities of the constituent units, depending on the orientation of flow with respect to layering (i.e. flow parallel or perpendicular to layering, respectively). We outline the theory underlying these formulations, and provide experimental permeability dat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that even if tuffisites are relatively uncommon, their influence on the permeability of an otherwise impermeable magmatic plug can be very large. For example, a single permeable pathway within an large low‐permeability rock mass can increase the equivalent permeability of the system by many orders of magnitude, as discussed in, for example, Heap and Kennedy (), Farquharson et al (), and Farquharson and Wadsworth (). Finally, although the outgassing flux could be computed using either Darcy law (low Reynolds number) or the Forchheimer equation using the constraints of permeability provided herein, we note that while our determination of the porosity‐permeability relationship is valid locally, the depth‐dependent stress and the coupling between the evolving gas pressure and the sintering rates demands a full numerical solution (e.g., Michaut et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also note that even if tuffisites are relatively uncommon, their influence on the permeability of an otherwise impermeable magmatic plug can be very large. For example, a single permeable pathway within an large low‐permeability rock mass can increase the equivalent permeability of the system by many orders of magnitude, as discussed in, for example, Heap and Kennedy (), Farquharson et al (), and Farquharson and Wadsworth (). Finally, although the outgassing flux could be computed using either Darcy law (low Reynolds number) or the Forchheimer equation using the constraints of permeability provided herein, we note that while our determination of the porosity‐permeability relationship is valid locally, the depth‐dependent stress and the coupling between the evolving gas pressure and the sintering rates demands a full numerical solution (e.g., Michaut et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the borehole scale, Durán, van Wijk, et al () show that elastic wave attenuation estimated over tens of meters of rocks is equivalent to arithmetically averaging attenuation values estimated over finer (few meter) scales. Farquharson and Wadsworth () propose different ways of upscaling laboratory permeability to the field in anisotropically fractured rocks. Although matrix porosity is thought to play a nominal role in fluid movement within liquid‐dominated geothermal reservoirs like Ngatamariki (Wallis et al, ), the methodology presented herein and the systematic patterns of porosity with lithology‐alteration can be applied to two‐phase or vapor‐dominated reservoirs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we relax that assumption, we can add the scaled contribution from the host by (Ebigbo et al, ; Heap & Kennedy, ) ⟨⟩k=ϕfkf+ϕhkh=Afkf+AhkhAT, where k f is the total fracture permeability, ϕ h is the host surface fraction, k h is the host permeability, which we take to be isotropic, and A h is the cross‐sectional area of the host rock, such that A h = A T − A f . When the fractures are of nonequal width, the contributions from each width class can be summed and weighted by the area of that class, following solutions for directionally dependent permeability in anisotropic systems (Farquharson & Wadsworth, ). We note that this is different from the approach of Lamur et al () in which k h is added to k ′ without scaling the contributions.…”
Section: Scaling Approach For the Permeability Of Fractured Lavamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For flow in the horizontal directions, there are two possibilities: in the x ‐direction, the hexagons are arranged in a “pointy topped” array and in the y ‐direction in a “flat topped” array. We can use the rotation matrix method (described in the context of volcanic rocks in Farquharson & Wadsworth, ) to scale the two‐dimensional tensorial description of the permeability of a hexagonal array in each mutually perpendicular horizontal direction, which we term truek̂, as follows truek̂bold=bold-italicRkR1=[]k1cos2θ+k2sin2θ()k1k2cosθsinθ()k1k2cosθsinθk1sin2θ+k2cos2θ, where k is the permeability tensor prior to rotation and R is the rotation matrix, such that boldkbold=[]k100k2bold,1embold bold-italicR=[]cosθsinθsinθcosθ. …”
Section: Scaling Approach For the Permeability Of Fractured Lavamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation