2006
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1362.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upside‐Down Protein Crystallization

Abstract: The benefits of protein crystal growth in microgravity are well documented. The crystallization vessels currently employed for microgravity crystallization are far from optimal with regards to cost, sample volume, size, and ease of use. The use of microbatch experiments is a favorable alternative in each respect: 96 experiments of 0.5-2 microL volumes can be performed in a single microtiter tray measuring 5 x 8 cm and costing 1 pound sterling each. To date, the use of microbatch has not been pursued on account… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…
Fig. 1 Crystallisation phase diagram and set ups using the modified hanging drop and microbatch methods ( a ) Schematic illustration of a protein crystallisation phase diagram showing that the adjustable parameters are precipitant or additive concentration, pH and temperature (Chayen 2004 ) ( b ) 24-well crystallisation tool with screwcaps incorporating the coverslips where crystallisation drops are set up, ( c ) the close-up of a single screw cap on its well, ( d ) standard microbatch under oil experiments, ( e ) inverted experiments (Chayen 2005 ; Khurshid and Chayen 2006 )
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…
Fig. 1 Crystallisation phase diagram and set ups using the modified hanging drop and microbatch methods ( a ) Schematic illustration of a protein crystallisation phase diagram showing that the adjustable parameters are precipitant or additive concentration, pH and temperature (Chayen 2004 ) ( b ) 24-well crystallisation tool with screwcaps incorporating the coverslips where crystallisation drops are set up, ( c ) the close-up of a single screw cap on its well, ( d ) standard microbatch under oil experiments, ( e ) inverted experiments (Chayen 2005 ; Khurshid and Chayen 2006 )
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… ( b ) 24-well crystallisation tool with screwcaps incorporating the coverslips where crystallisation drops are set up, ( c ) the close-up of a single screw cap on its well, ( d ) standard microbatch under oil experiments, ( e ) inverted experiments (Chayen 2005 ; Khurshid and Chayen 2006 ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New crystallization methods and techniques are very often tested on readily available and easily crystallized proteins, such as lysozyme, glucose isomerase, or thaumatin (for recent examples, see Dunlop & Hazes, 2005;Hansen et al, 2006;Khurshid & Chayen, 2006, among many others). However, this approach is not too informative as these model proteins usually crystallize very readily; it is relatively difficult to find conditions in which lysozyme does not crystallize (Chayen & Saridakis, 2001).…”
Section: Test Setmentioning
confidence: 99%