Acoustic Emission 2012
DOI: 10.5772/31332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Upstream Multiphase Flow Assurance Monitoring Using Acoustic Emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed correlation and DAK correlation after Ppr of 10.5 still matches the measured data trend, but after Ppr of 18 the DAK correlation started to deviate from the measured data trend. (43) can be used to determine the gas compressibility. The proposed correlation is the only one that can predict the Z-factor for very high pressure gas reservoirs as shown in Eig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed correlation and DAK correlation after Ppr of 10.5 still matches the measured data trend, but after Ppr of 18 the DAK correlation started to deviate from the measured data trend. (43) can be used to determine the gas compressibility. The proposed correlation is the only one that can predict the Z-factor for very high pressure gas reservoirs as shown in Eig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 10 shows the accuracy of the proposed correlation in estimating the Z-factor that in turn will give accurate estimation of the gas density and viscosity. Gas viscosity is an itTiportant factor in modeling of the three phase flow through pipes or through the reservoir and the accuracy of modeling this fiow depends on the accuracy of many parameters such as Z-factor, gas density, and gas viscosity [43,44]. The same problem will be faced with DAK correlation for high pressure range as discussed before.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acoustic emission (AE) has also gained significant attention in multiphase flow. 149,153 Multiphase flow can be encountered in all oil and gas production systems and connected with all kinds of flow assurance problems discussed in the Introduction. Therefore, it is vital to understand the multiphase flow first before assessing the flow assurance issues.…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Assurance Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flow regime, pressure–temperature conditions, surface-tension forces, flow rates, pipe diameter, inclination angle, and fluid properties are the foremost factors controlling the multiphase flow in flowlines, risers, wellbores, etc. Therefore, it is vital to understand the multiphase flow dynamics/flow pattern in various pipe geometries. Figure illustrates the various flow regimes for vertical and horizontal gas–liquid pipeline flow mapped with the visual schematics . Four standard multiphase flow regimes can generally be observed depending on the superficial gas/liquid velocities: (i) stratified flow, wherein an uninterrupted flow of liquid stream at the bottom and gas stream at the top can be observed as presented in Figure (with the increase in gas velocity, the regime can be moved toward a stratified wavy flow); (ii) slug flow, or plug flow, which can be observed while increasing the liquid velocity toward turbulent flow; (ii) annular flow, wherein a thin film of liquid phase adheres to the pipeline wall and a gas stream in the middle along with liquid droplets (refer to Figure ); and (iv) bubble flow, wherein the gas phase is bubbling through the liquid phase.…”
Section: Multiphase Flow Assurance Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is non-intrusive and is unaffected by the presence of dust as the apparatus is placed in an enclosed housing. Furthermore, since AE generated within a material, manifesting as elastic waves on the surface of the material, cover a relatively high frequency range (typically from 20 kHz to 1 MHz), lower frequency machine vibrations will not hinder the device’s performance [21]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%