Uptake of Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs Colonoscopy for Screening Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Adrián–de–Ganzo, Zaida; Alarcón–Fernández, Onofre; Ramos, Laura; Gimeno–García, Antonio Z.; Alonso‐Abreu, Inmaculada; Carrillo, Marta; Quintero, Enrique

doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.06.032

Cited by 31 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another interesting study examined the uptake of PCCE-2 versus conventional colonoscopy for the screening of asymptomatic first degree relatives (FDRs) of CRC patients (20). Among the 120 eligible FDRs who were assigned to undergo colon capsule endoscopy (CCE), only 68 (56.6%) agreed to participate in the study.…”

Section: Polyp Detection Rate Using the Pcce Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases

Carter

Eliakim

2016

Ann. Transl. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Diseases affecting the colon are common worldwide and can cause a major health problem. Colorectal cancer (CRC) as well as Inflammatory bowel diseases represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality in western countries. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) is a novel and promising technology that can be useful for the screening and monitoring of colonic diseases. In the recent years many articles examined the use of various versions of PCCE-the 1st and 2nd generation versus various other endoscopic or radiologic modalities both for detection of colonic polyps or cancer and in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease. The aim of the current review is to provide up to date information regarding the use and usefulness of this method in these disease.

show abstract

Section: Polyp Detection Rate Using the Pcce Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases

Carter

Eliakim

2016

Ann. Transl. Med.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Capsule excretion rates or complete colorectal observational rates have varied among studies. Using the European traditional bowel preparation of a large-volume PEG (4.5-6 L) followed by oral sodium phosphate booster (1.5-2.0 L) and with prokinetics such as domperidone, capsule excretion rates within approximately 10 h or battery life has been 70%-88%, 9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] except for studies by van Gossum (93%) 20 and by Sacher-Huvelin (95%). 21 If the data of all listed studies above are taken together, the capsule excretion rate would be 88% (1243/1407).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Overall adequate colorectal cleansing levels at CCE in previous studies have been 52%-94%. 3,6,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]25,26 Although castor oil did not significantly interfere with colorectal cleansing levels in spite of reducing fluid and lavage loading, the regimen with castor oil showed an average cleansing level. Sensitivity and specificity of the second-generation CCE for subjects with at least one polyp with maximum size 6 mm or larger in previous studies have been 84%-94% and 64%-94%, respectively.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multicenter feasibility study of bowel preparation with castor oil for colon capsule endoscopy

Ohmiya

Hotta

Mitsufuji³

et al. 2018

Digestive Endoscopy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An advantage of the CCE is the possibility to perform the investigation in the patients' home [4]. Former individuals' experiences can be of value to future patients, especially if they have a choice between methods [7], as is the case in colorectal examination [2,6,[8][9][10][11][12]. Moreover, new technologies optimally go through an assessment in order to guide politicians and clinical practice, and such a comprehensive health technology assessment (HTA) contains benefits and harms including patient-based evidence [13].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Screening individuals’ experiences of colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy; a mixed methods study

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The standard investigation in colorectal cancer screening (optical colonoscopy [OC]) has a less invasive alternative with the colon capsule endoscopy (CCE). The experiences of screening individuals are needed to support a decision aid (DA) and to provide a patient view in future health technology assessments (HTA). We aimed to explore the experiences of CCE at home and OC in an outpatient clinic by screening participants who experienced both investigations on the same bowel preparation. Methods: In a mixed methods study, Danish screening individuals with a positive immunological fecal occult blood test (FIT) were consecutively included and underwent both CCE and OC in the same bowel preparation. They answered questionnaires about discomfort during CCE, delivered at home, and during a following OC in the outpatient clinic. Data were calculated in percentages and Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparisons. Among the 253 included patients, 10 participants were selected for a semi-structured interview about their experiences of the two examinations. The analysis and interpretation of the transcribed data were inspired by Ricoeur. Results: Questionnaire data were received from 239 participants and revealed significant less discomfort during the CCE than the OC. Interview data included explained discomfort elements in two categories: 'The examination' and 'The setting'. Compared to OC, the CCE was experienced with less pain, embarrassment and invasiveness, but presented challenges and disadvantages as well, i.e., a large camera capsule to swallow, a longer waiting time for test results after CCE and an additional OC, if pathologies were found. The home setting for CCE delivery made the participants feel less like they were ill or patients less restricted and that they received more personal care, but could induce technical challenges. MethodsA mixed methods design was chosen in order to obtain as comprehensive knowledge as possible. Within a cohort study

show abstract

Uptake of Colon Capsule Endoscopy vs Colonoscopy for Screening Relatives of Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Cited by 31 publications

References 28 publications

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases

PillCam colon capsule endoscopy (PCCE) in colonic diseases

Multicenter feasibility study of bowel preparation with castor oil for colon capsule endoscopy

Screening individuals’ experiences of colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy; a mixed methods study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About