2000
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.62.2173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uptake of gases in bundles of carbon nanotubes

Abstract: Model calculations are presented which predict whether or not an arbitrary gas experiences significant absorption within carbon nanotubes and/or bundles of nanotubes. The potentials used in these calculations assume a conventional form, based on a sum of two-body interactions with individual carbon atoms; the latter employ energy and distance parameters which are derived from empirical combining rules. The results confirm intuitive expectation that small atoms and molecules are absorbed within both the interst… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
256
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
10
256
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As was demonstrated by the study in the previous section, the complete removal of oxygen from the surface of SWCNTs is not accomplished by annealing (Figure 4b). It seems likely that the same is true for graphene, especially considering the fact that graphene and CNTs have been used for gas sensing and adsorption due, in part, to their extremely high surface areas [26,34,35]. A comparison of the combined percentages of "Cr(0)" for functionalized graphene (39.5%) and functionalized SWCNTs (18.5%) is consistent with the lower metal catalyst residue in the graphene (ppm).…”
Section: Reaction Of Cr(co) 6 With Graphenesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…As was demonstrated by the study in the previous section, the complete removal of oxygen from the surface of SWCNTs is not accomplished by annealing (Figure 4b). It seems likely that the same is true for graphene, especially considering the fact that graphene and CNTs have been used for gas sensing and adsorption due, in part, to their extremely high surface areas [26,34,35]. A comparison of the combined percentages of "Cr(0)" for functionalized graphene (39.5%) and functionalized SWCNTs (18.5%) is consistent with the lower metal catalyst residue in the graphene (ppm).…”
Section: Reaction Of Cr(co) 6 With Graphenesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Here we choose the LJ parameters as ǫ = 2.413 meV and σ = 3.4Å [20] which represent the depth and range of the LJ potential energy, respectively. Note that the LJ potential is a simple and commonly used potential for modeling the interaction between carbon nanostructures [21,22].…”
Section: The Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, theoretical calculations showed that, when He, H 2 , and Ne are adsorbed onto the channels of CNTs, all other molecules are too large to enter in these small spaces (Stan et al 2000a). The interstitial channels are accessible and the most attractive sites among all charge neutral surfaces to adsorb 4 He, H 2 , and Ne (Cole et al 2000;Kahng et al 2011;Stan et al 2000b;Weber et al 2000).…”
Section: Separation Of Gaseous Mixtures Using Cnt Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%